Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh

Dr Surender Singh Saini vs Prof S Anantha Rao Ramakrishana And ... on 10 April, 2023

                              1

             CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
                    CHANDIGARH BENCH

                    C.P. No. 060/17/2023
                              IN
                    O.A. No. 68/2023


             Chandigarh, this the 10th day of April, 2023

     HON'BLE SH. SURESH KUMAR BATRA, MEMBER (J)

   Dr. Surinder Singh Saini, Sr. Principal Scientist aged about
   47 years son of Sh. Prithvi Singh Saini, A-15, Type V, CSIO
   Colony, Sector 30, Chandigarh-160030. Group 'A'


                                                        ...Applicant

(BY ADVOCATE: Sh. SUMIT GULERIA PROXY FOR SH. S.S.
PATHANIA)


                          VERSUS

 1. Prof S Anantha Rao Ramakrishna, Director, CSIR - Central

   Scientific Instruments Organization, Sector-30, Chandigarh

   - 160030 through its Director. Email: [email protected]

 2. Mr Jaswant Rai, Senior Controller of Administration CSIR -

   Central   Scientific   Instruments   Organization,    Sector-30,

   Chandigarh-160030 through its Director.

                                                ...Respondents


    (BY ADVOCATE: Sh. VIKAS KUTHIALA)
                               2

                     O R D E R(Oral)

 Per: SURESH KUMAR BATRA, MEMBER (J):

1. Pursuant to the directions issued by this Tribunal, learned counsel for the applicant has filed photocopy of the pay slip of month of February, 2023. From the perusal of the same it is evident that no recovery is being affected by the respondents post order dated 31.01.2023 passed by this Tribunal.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant has also admitted that since February no recovery is being made by the respondents.

3. In view of the above facts, there is no ground to issue notice to the respondents.

4. C.P. is dismissed accordingly.

(SURESH KUMAR BATRA) Member (J) MS*