Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 8, Cited by 4]

Supreme Court of India

State Of Gujarat & Anr vs Patel Naranbhai Nathubai & Ors on 26 September, 1989

Equivalent citations: 1989 SCR, SUPL. (1) 247 1989 SCC (4) 633, AIR 1990 SUPREME COURT 1232, 1989 (4) SCC 633, 1989 (15) ALL LR 752, 1989 2 RRR 375, (1989) 3 JT 734 (SC), (1990) 1 CIVLJ 554, (1990) 1 CURCC 297, (1990) 1 GUJ LR 200, (1990) 1 GUJ LH 77, (1989) 39 DLT 375

Author: Misra Rangnath

Bench: Misra Rangnath, G.L. Oza

           PETITIONER:
STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.

	Vs.

RESPONDENT:
PATEL NARANBHAI NATHUBAI & ORS.

DATE OF JUDGMENT26/09/1989

BENCH:
MISRA RANGNATH
BENCH:
MISRA RANGNATH
OZA, G.L. (J)

CITATION:
 1989 SCR  Supl. (1) 247  1989 SCC  (4) 633
 JT 1989 (3)   734	  1989 SCALE  (2)664


ACT:
    Land  Acquisition  Act,  1894: Sections  4	and  6--Land
Acquisition  (Amendment	 and Validation)  Act,	1967--Effect
of--Delay in making declaration--Validity of.



HEADNOTE:
    A  preliminary  notification under Section 4(1)  of	 the
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was made on 26.7.1963. The decla-
ration under Section 6 was duly notified on 16/18.1.1969.  A
Writ  Petition was filed in the High Court  challenging	 the
declaration. The High Court took notice of the Land Acquisi-
tion  (Amendment & Validation) Act, 1967, but held that	 the
delay of 5 1/2 years from the date of the preliminary  noti-
fication was unreasonable, and quashed the said declaration,
relying on its own decision in Valji Mulji v. State, 11	 GLR
95.
    These  appeals, by special leave, are against  the	High
Court's judgment.
Allowing the appeals,
    HELD:  1.  The validation provision came into  force  on
20th  January, 1967. The position is now concluded  and	 the
reliance placed by the High Court on its decision cannot  be
sustained. [248E]
    Gujarat  State  Transport  Corporation  v.	Valji  Mulji
Soneji & Ors., [1979] 3 SCC 202 and State of Gujarat &	Anr.
v. Punjabhai Mathubai & Ors., [1986] 2 SCC 478, followed.
    2.	The decision of the High Court is set aside and	 the
declaration  under s. 6 of the Land Acquisition Act is	sus-
tained. [248F]



JUDGMENT:

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal Nos. 1506- 1507 of 1974.

From the Judgment and Order dated 4.8.1972 of the Guja- rat High Court in Special Civil Appln. No. 121 of 1972 and 1187 of 1970.

248

G.A. Shah and M.N. Shroff for the Appellants. V.V. Vaze, Ms. Gitanjali, P.H. Parekh (N.P.), Vimal Dave (N.P.) and M. Mudgal (N.P.) for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by RANGANATH MISRA, J. These appeals by special leave are directed against the judgment of the Gujarat High Court dated 4.8.1972 quashing the declaration under s. 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, Act 1 of 1894, on the ground that the same made on 18th of January, 1969, was issued beyond rea- sonable time.

The short facts are: The preliminary notification under s. 4(1) of the Act was made on 26.7.1963. On 16/18, 1,J969, the declaration under s. 6 was duly notified. On 17.1.1972 a writ petition was filed in the High Court challenging the declaration. The High Court took notice of the Land Acquisi- tion (Amendment & Validation) Act of 1967 but relying upon a Division Bench judgment of the same High Court in Valji Mulji v. State, 11 GLR 95 held that the period of 5-1/2 years from the date of the preliminary notification was unreasonable delay for making of the declaration under s. 6 of the Act.

The validation provision came into force on 20th Janu- ary, 1967. Two judgments of this Court dealing with this aspect being Gujarat State Transport Corporation v. Valji Mulji Soneji & Ors., [1979] 3 SCC 202 and State of Gujarat & Anr. v. Punjabai Nathubhai & Ors., [1986] 2 SCC 478 have now concluded the position with reference to the provisions of the Validation Act and on the ratio of these judgments the decision of the Gujarat High Court on which reliance was placed by the High Court in disposing of these matters cannot be sustained. We accordingly allow the appeals, set aside the decision of the High Court and sustain the decla- ration under s. 6 of the Land Acquisition Act dated 18.1. 1969.

There shall be no order as to costs.

G.N.						     Appeals
allowed.
249