Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

G Satyanarayana Setty vs The Airforce Station on 5 July, 2017

Author: B.S.Patil

Bench: B.S.Patil

                            1


     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

          DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JULY, 2017

                         BEFORE

            THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE B.S.PATIL

               W.P.No. 54748/2016 (LA-RES)

BETWEEN

G SATYANARAYANA SETTY
SON OF LATE N GIRIYAPPA SETTY
AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS
AND RESIDING AT NO 60/61
BBMP OFFICE CIRCLE
C/O HANUMAN TRADERS
YELAHANKA OLD TOWN
BENGALURU - 560064
                                             ... PETITIONER
(BY SRI SUNDARA RAMAN M V
    & SMT SANJANA RAO, ADVS.)

AND

1.    THE AIRFORCE STATION
      YELAHANKA BANGALORE - 560063
      REPRESENTED BY MR S K CHAUHAN
      GROUP CAPTION
      STATION WORKS OFFICE

2.    MILITARY ESTATES OFFICE
      KARNATAKA CIRCLE
      K KAMARAJ ROAD
      BANGALORE - 560042
      REPRESENTED BY
      THE DEFENCE ESTATES OFFICER

3.    TAHSILDAR
      BANGALORE NORTH TALUK
      YELAHANKA SUB DIVISION
      BANGALORE - 560064

4.    THE MINISTRY OF DEFENCE
      SOUTH BLOCK
                              2


     CABINET SECRETARIAT
     RAISINA HILL, NEW DELHI - 110011
     REPRESENTED BY
     THE SECRETARY OF DEFENCE
     MR G MOHAN KUMAR
                                            ... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI VENKATESH DODDERI, ADV. FOR R3
    SRI C. SHASHIKANTHA, CGC FOR R1 & R4)

                              ********
      THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227
OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT
THE ACQUISTIION OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY VIDE
PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DTD:12.2.1943 ISSUED UNDER
SECTION 4(1) AND THE FINAL NOTIFICATION ISSUED UNDER
SECTION 6(1) NO.3441-W BOTH DTD:12.2.1943 (ANENXURE-A)
ISSUED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAND ACQUISITION
ACT, 1894 HAS LAPSED BY VIRTUE OF SECTION 24(2) OF THE
RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND
ACQUISITION REHABILITIATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013

    THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                          ORDER

1. Learned counsel for petitioner has filed a memo dated 29.06.2017 stating that this petition may be dismissed as withdrawn.

2. Memo is placed on record. Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

JUDGE VP