Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur

Smt Ranobai And Ors vs State Of Rajasthan Through Pp on 4 April, 2018

Author: Pankaj Bhandari

Bench: Pankaj Bhandari

       HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                   BENCH AT JAIPUR
       S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail No. 4000/2018

1.      Smt. Ranobai W/o Shri Surensingh B/c Raisikh, R/o
        Bathkol, Kishangarhbas Distt. Alwar, At Present R/o
        Aabad    Mahabadar       Thana     Shrigarhmukteshwar     Sahib
        (Punjab) (At Present Confined Central Jail, Alwar)
2.      Rajesh Kumar S/o Burjilal B/c Chamar, R/o Bhatkol Thana
        Kishangarhbas Distt. Alwar. (At Present Confined In Sub
        Jail Kishangarhbas Distt. Alwar)
3.      Pramod S/o Shri Mahaveer B/c Ahir, R/o Langadwas
        Thana Kishangarhbas Distt. Alwar (At Present Confined In
        Sub Jail Kishangarhbas Distt. Alwar)
4.      Smt. Seemabai W/o Shri Suchcha Singh B/c Raisikh, R/o
        Bai Thana Tijara Distt. Alwar (At Present Confined In
        Central Jail, Alwar)
5.      Smt. Bablo Bai W/o Shri Ranjeet Singh B/c Nawasi Bai
        Thana Tijara Distt. Alwar, (At Present Confined In Central
        Jail, Alwar)
                                                         ----Petitioners
                                  Versus
State Of Rajasthan Through P.p.
                                                        ----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)       :      Mr. Sanjay Khan
For Respondent(s)       :      Mr. R.R. Singh Rathore, PP



          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI

                        Judgment / Order

04/04/2018

1. Petitioners have filed this bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.

2. F.I.R. No.300/2016 was registered at Police Station Kishangarhbas District Alwar (Raj.) for offence under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B of I.P.C.

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-4000/2018]

3. It is contended by counsel for the petitioners that the sale deed with respect to which the present F.I.R. has been filed stand cancelled by the Revenue Court. Co-accused have been given benefit of bail by this Court.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

5. I have considered the contentions.

6. Considering the contentions put forth by counsel for the petitioners, I deem it proper to allow the bail application.

7. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused petitioners shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J Arti/68