Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Central Administrative Tribunal - Madras

S Muthuramalingam vs Ut Of Puducherry on 7 March, 2024

                                         1                OA 310/00308/2024


               CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
                        CHENNAI BENCH

                            OA/310/00308/2024

     Dated Thursday the 7th day of March Two Thousand Twenty Four

                         CORAM :
           HON'BLE MR. MANISH GARG, Member (J)
                            &
     HON'BLE MR. VARUN SINDHU KUL KAUMUDI, Member (A)

S. Muthuramalingam @ Praveenkumar, S/o. M. Singaravel, No. 10, Vellalar
Street, Thirunallar - 609 607.                           ... Applicant

By Advocate Mr. C. Prakasam

Vs

1. The Under Secretary to Government
Department of Personnel and Administrative
Reforms (Personnel Wing)
Government of Puducherry
Puducherry 605 001.

2. The Transport Commissioner
Transport Department
Government of Puducherry
Puducherry 605 001.

3. The Deputy Secretary to Government
Agriculture Department
Government of Puducherry
Puducherry 605 001.

4. The Deputy Director (Admn)
Directorate of Industries and Commerce
Government of Puducherry
Puducherry 605 001.                                 ... Respondents

By Advocate Mr. R. Syed Mustafa
                                            2                    OA 310/00308/2024




                               ORAL ORDER

(Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member(J)) In the instant OA, the applicant seeks the following relief:

"....to extend the relaxation of the upper age limit for the post of Grade-B post by extend benefits already given by the 1st respondent in G.O. Ms. No. 50, Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms (Personnel Wing), Puducherry, dated 29.07.2022 and thus render justice."

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant wishes to withdraw this OA. Learned counsel for applicant prays for permission for the same. Necessary endorsement has been made in the OA records to that effect.

3. In view of the above, OA is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.




 (Varun Sindhu Kul Kaumudi)                                  (Manish Garg)
      Member (A)                                               Member(J)
                                     07.03.2024
AS