Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi vs Jai Prakash Gupta on 2 May, 2023

Author: M.R. Shah

Bench: M.R. Shah

                                                             1

                                            IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

                                             CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                            CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3329 OF 2023
                                       (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 9354/2023)
                                                 (@ D. No. 1989/2023)


     GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.                                                   Appellant(s)

                         ERSUS

     JAI PRAKASH GUPTA & ORS.                                                       Respondent(s)



                                                     O R D E R1

     1.                  Delay condoned

     2.                  Leave granted.

     3.                  Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment

     and order dated 27.02.2018 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New

     Delhi in Writ Petition (C) No. 1775 of 2016, by which the High

     Court has allowed the said Writ Petition and has declared that the

     acquisition with respect to the land in question is deemed to have

     lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and

     Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement

     Act,                 2013   (hereinafter      referred      to    as    “the   2013   Act”),    the

     Government                  of   NCT   of   Delhi   &   Anr.     have   preferred     the   present

     appeal.

     4.                  From the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court,

     it appears that and it is not disputed by learned counsel for the
Signature Not Verified


     respondents that the possession of the land in question was already
Digitally signed by R
Natarajan
Date: 2023.05.09
16:35:43 IST
Reason:


     taken over on 09.09.2009 and even the compensation was deposited in

     the Court of learned Additional District Judge.
                                              2

5.    In view of the above and once the possession of the land in

question was taken, as far back as on 09.09.2009, as per the law

laid down by the Constitution Bench decision of this Court in the

case of Indore Development Authority vs. Manoharlal & Ors. Etc.

reported in 2020 (8) SCC 129, there shall be no deemed lapse of

acquisition under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.



6.    Under     the     circumstances,        the    impugned      judgment      and   order

passed     by   the     High   Court   declaring         that    the    acquisition      with

respect    to   the     land   in    question       is   deemed    to    have    lapsed   is

unsustainable and the same deserves to be quashed and set aside and

is, accordingly, quashed and set aside.



7.    At    this      stage,     learned      counsel      for     the    original       writ

petitioners has submitted that, as the Award was declared in the

year 2008 and the compensation was deposited in the reference Court

in the year 2016, the original writ petitioner shall be entitled to

the   compensation        even      under   the     Land    Acquisition         Act,   1984,

however, with interest from 2008 to 2016.                       To the aforesaid, it is

observed that it will be open for the original writ petitioner to

move an appropriate application before the concerned Court where

the   amount       is    deposited      for       withdrawal      of     the    amount     of

compensation and as and when such application is made, the same be

considered in accordance with law and on its own merits.



8.    It will be        open for the original writ petitioners to approach

the competent authority for interest on the delayed deposit of the
                                         3

amount   of    compensation   and   as       and   when   such   application   is

preferred the same be considered in accordance with law and on its

own merits as early as possible.



9.   With this, the present appeal is allowed.




                                                   ...........................J
                                                                    (M.R. SHAH)



                                                   ...........................J
                                                                 (MANOJ MISRA)
New Delhi;
May 02, 2023
                                    4

ITEM NO.28                 COURT NO.4                SECTION XIV-A

                 S U P R E M E C O U R T O F     I N D I A
                         RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

             Special Leave Petition (C) D. No(s).   1989/2023

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.                           Petitioner(s)

                                  VERSUS

JAI PRAKASH GUPTA & ORS.                               Respondent(s)

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.18756/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY
IN FILING)

Date : 02-05-2023 This matter was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :   HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ MISRA

For Petitioner(s)     Ms. Astha Tyagi, AOR

For Respondent(s)    Mr. Prithvi Pal, AOR
                     Mr. S K Rout, Adv.
                     Mr. Priyonkoo Anjan Gogoi, Adv.
                     Mr. Amit Acharya, Adv.
                     Mr. Ganesh Singh, Adv.
                     Mr. Aman Mehrotra, Adv.
                     Mr. Rahul Kumar, Adv.

                     Ms. Malvika Kapila, AOR
                     Ms. Tanwangi Shukla, Adv.

           UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                              O R D E R

Delay condoned Leave granted.

The present appeal is allowed in terms of the signed order. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (R. NATARAJAN) (NISHA TRIPATHI) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (Signed order is placed on the file)