Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Gujarat High Court

Piyushkumar Jayantibhai Patel vs State Of Gujarat & 2 on 6 October, 2015

Author: R.M.Chhaya

Bench: R.M.Chhaya

                       C/SCA/16046/2015                                           ORDER



                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION  NO. 16046 of 2015
         =========================================================
               PIYUSHKUMAR JAYANTIBHAI PATEL....Petitioner(s)
                                    Versus
                   STATE OF GUJARAT  &  2....Respondent(s)
         =========================================================
         Appearance:
         TATVDEEP J JANI, ADVOCATE for Petitioner(s) No. 1
         MR MANAN MEHTA,AGP for Respondent authorities on advance copy
         =========================================================
                CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.M.CHHAYA
                              Date : 06/10/2015
                                 ORAL ORDER

(1) Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. (2) It   appears   from   the   record   that   the  petitioner  has  challenged   (common)   order   passed   by   the  respondent­ District   Collector   by   way   of   filing   Revision  Application   Nos.R­44,   R­55,   R­56   and   R­65   to   R­72.  Learned   advocate   for   the   petitioner   has   also   relied  upon the order passed by this Court in identical and  similar matters.  Learned Assistant Government Pleader  for the respondent  authorities also states that this  Court   has   issued   appropriate   directions   to   the  revisional authority. 

(3) Considering   the   averments   made   in   the   petition,  respondent No.2 is hereby directed to give priority to  the aforesaid Revision Applications and after hearing  the   concerned   parties   pass   appropriate   orders   on  merits, as expeditiously as possible preferably within  a   period   of   09   (nine)   months.   It   is   clarified   that  this   Court   has   not   entered   into   the   merits   of   the  matter   and   the   revisional   authority   shall   pass  appropriate   orders   strictly  in   accordance   with   law.  D.S. permitted. 

 Sd/­        [R.M.CHHAYA, J ] *** Bhavesh­[pps]*  Page 1 of 1 HC-NIC Page 1 of 1 Created On Wed Oct 07 02:29:58 IST 2015