Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Siesta Logistics Corporation Ltd vs Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) on 28 December, 2010

Author: Antony Dominic

Bench: Antony Dominic

       

  

  

 
 
                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                               PRESENT:

                        THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC

                WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL 2013/20TH CHAITHRA 1935

                                   WP(C).No. 10146 of 2013 (P)
                                   ---------------------------------------

PETITIONER:
-------------------


            SIESTA LOGISTICS CORPORATION LTD.,
            REPRESENTED BY ANILKUMAR MISHRA, AGED 31,
            S/O.LATE R.S.MISHRA,
            MANAGER (OPERATIONS),
            SIESTA LOGISTICS CORPORATION LTD., CP XI/655-S,
            S.M.TOWER, COCHIN BANK JUNCTION, ASOKAPUARAM,
            ALUVA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.


            BY ADVS.SRI.K.ABDUL JAWAD,
                        SRI.P.H.SHAJAHAN.


RESPONDENTS:
------------------------


        1. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS),
            COMMERCIAL TAXES,
            OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS),
            ERNAKULAM- 682 035.

        2. INTELLIGENCE OFFICER,
            SQUAD NO.VI, COMMERCIAL TAXES,
            OFFICE OF THE INSPECTING ASSISTANT -
            COMMISSIONER (INTELLIGENCE), ERNAKULAM - 682 035.

        3. INTELLIGENCE OFFICER,
            SQUAD NO.1, COMMERCIAL TAXES,
            OFFICE OF THE INSPECTING ASSISTANT -
            COMMISSIONER (INTELLIGENCE), ALAPPUZHA - 688 001.

        4. THE INTELLIGENCE INSPECTOR,
            SQUAD NO.1, COMMERCIAL TAXES,
            OFFICE OF THE INSPECTING ASSISTANT -
            COMMISSIONER (INTELLIGENCE), ALAPPUZHA - 688 001.


            BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN.


            THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
            ON 10-04-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
            FOLLOWING:

Prv.

W.P.(C). NO.10146/2013-P:



                     APPENDIX


PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:


EXHIBIT P1.   TRUE COPY OF THE INVOICE HAVING SERIAL NO.KEO2158961
              DATED 28/12/2010.

EXHIBIT P2.   TRUE COPY OF THE INVOICE HAVING SERIAL NO.KEO.2158962
              DATED 28/12/2010.

EXHIBIT P3.   TRUE COPY OF THE CONSIGNEMNT NOTE DATED 28/12/2010.

EXHIBIT P4.   TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 29/12/2010 ISSUED BY THE 4TH
              RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P5.   TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY FILED BY THE DRIVER BEFORE THE 4TH
              RESPONDENT DATED 29/12/2010.

EXHIBIT P6.   TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT
              DATED 29/12/2010.

EXHIBIT P7.   TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT IN
              W.P.(C). NO.658/2011 DATED 10/1/2011.

EXHIBIT P8.   TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT FOR BANK GUARANTEE ISSUED BY
              THE ICIC BANK DATED 10/1/2011.

EXHIBIT P9.   TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT IN
              WPC NO.658/2011 DATED 18/1/2011.

EXHIBIT P10. TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT
              DATED 24/3/2013.

EXHIBIT P11. TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY AUTHORISED SIGNATORY ICICI
              BANK ON 2/4/2013.

EXHIBIT P12. TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM DATED 5/4/2013.

EXHIBIT P13. TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 5/4/2013.


RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL.




                                                //TRUE COPY//




                                                P.A. TO JUDGE


Prv.



                     ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
                  -------------------------------------------
                    W.P(C).No.10146 of 2013
                  -------------------------------------------
              Dated this the 10th day of April, 2013

                              JUDGMENT

1.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

2.Ext.P10 is an order passed under section 47(6) of the KVAT Act imposing a penalty of Rs.6,71,838/- on the petitioner. According to the petitioner, aggrieved by this order, they have filed Ext.P12 appeal before the first respondent. It is stated that during the pendency of the appeal, the respondents have invoked the bank guarantee and realised the penalty amount due under Ext.P10. Therefore, this writ petition is filed seeking a direction for expeditious disposal of the appeal.

3.Now that the statutory appeal filed by the petitioner is pending and the petitioner is entitled to have the appeal decided on expeditious basis. Accordingly, I dispose of this writ petition directing the first respondent appellate authority to consider and pass orders on Ext.P12 appeal filed by the petitioner. This WPC.10146/13 2 shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three months of receipt of a copy of this judgment and a copy of the writ petition.

Writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

ANTONY DOMINIC Judge kkb.10/4.