Karnataka High Court
Sri Prashantha M G vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 November, 2012
Author: Subhash B.Adi
Bench: Subhash B Adi
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2012
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHASH B ADI
WRIT PETITION NOS.45710-45712/2012(S-RES)
BETWEEN :
1. SRI PRASHANTHA M G
S/O GUDADA MALLAPPA
AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS
R/AT:MANGOTE VILLAGE
S.K.MAGGI POST, BHADRAVATHI TALUK
DIST. SHIMOGA - 577 243
2. MISS.VANI S.P.
D/O PRAHLADAPPA
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS
R/AT: SIDLIPURA VILLAGE
BHADRAVATHI TALUK
DIST. SHIMOGA - 577 227
3. SRI.H.ANNAPPA
S/O HONNURAPPA
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS
R/AT HOLEHONNURU
AMBEDKAR NAGAR
BADRAVATHI TALUK
DIST. SHIMOGA - 577 227 ...PETITIONERS
( BY SRI.C M DESAI, ADV.,)
AND :
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION
2
M.SBUILDING
BANGALORE - 560 001.
2. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES
ALI ASKER ROAD
BANGALORE - 560 001
3. THE ASST. REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES
HOLEHONNURU
BADRAVATHI TALUK
DIST. SHIMOGA - 577 227.
4. RAITHA SEVA SAHAKARA SANGHA NIYAMITHA
HOLEHONNUR, BADRAVATHI TALUK
DIST. SHIMOGA - 577 227
REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
SRI. K.N.RAMASWAMY. ...RESPONDENTS
( BY SMT. MANJULA R KAMADOLLI, HCGP FOR R1 TO R3)
THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER 226 & 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE RESOLUTION
DATED 24.9.12 PASSED BY THE MANAGEMENT OF R4 SOCIETY UNDER
ANNX-F IN SO FAR AS IT PERTAINS TO CLAUSE 11 (15) CONCERNING
THE EPTITIONERS BY ISSUE OF WRIT OF CERTIORARI, DIRECT THE
R4 SOCIETY TO ISSUE APPOINT ORDERS TO THE PETITIONERS AS PER
SELECTION LIST BY ISSUE OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS & ETC.,
THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned Government Pleader is directed to take notice for respondent Nos.1 to 3.
2. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners. 3
3. The grievance of the petitioners is that, petitioners had made applications in pursuance of the advertisement issued by the fourth respondent for various posts. Petitioners were interviewed and their names were found in the selection list. However, erroneously the matter was again placed before the Committee of the fourth respondent. The fourth respondent erroneously had resolved to cancel the appointment of the petitioners.
4. If any dispute arises between the Management and the employees, a statutory remedy is provided under Section 70 of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act to raise a dispute.
Having regard to the same, keeping the liberty open to the petitioners to raise a dispute, these Writ Petitions stand disposed of.
Sd/-
JUDGE KNM/-