Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Zee Sports Ltd (Now Known As Zee Digital ... vs Nimbus Media Pte. Ltd on 21 April, 2017

Bench: Chief Justice, D.Y. Chandrachud, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

     ITEM NO.22                                COURT NO.1                       SECTION IX

                                   S U P R E M E C O U R T O F         I N D I A
                                           RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).11830/2017

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2017
     in CAL No.16/2017 in CSN No.320/2017 in ARBP No.1698/2015 passed by
     the High Court of Bombay)

     ZEE SPORTS LTD (NOW KNOWN AS ZEE DIGITAL
     CONVERGANCE LTD)                                                             Petitioner(s)
                                     VERSUS
     NIMBUS MEDIA PTE. LTD                                                        Respondent(s)

     (With appln.(s) for exemption                    from   filing    c/c   of   the   impugned
     judgment and interim relief)

     Date : 21/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                             HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
                             HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL

     For Petitioner(s)                  Mr.Harish Salve, Sr.Adv.
                                        Mr.Shyam Divan, Sr.Adv.
                                        Mr.Hitesh Jain, Adv.
                                        Ms.Shyel Trehan, Adv.
                                        Ms.Akshita Sachdeva, Adv.
                                        Ms.Monisha Mane, Adv.
                                        Ms. Liz Mathew, Adv.
     For Respondent(s)

                         Upon hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                          O R D E R

Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner. No ground for interference is made out in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution.

The special leave petition is accordingly dismissed. As a sequel to the above, pending interlocutory application also stands disposed of.

Signature Not Verified

Digitally signed by
SATISH KUMAR YADAV
Date: 2017.04.21
16:04:17 TLT
Reason:




     (SATISH KUMAR YADAV)                                                 (RENUKA SADANA)
          AR-CUM-PS                                                     ASSISTANT REGISTRAR