Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Orissa High Court

Ajit Baran Panda vs Deputy Director on 26 November, 2024

Bench: Arindam Sinha, M.S. Sahoo

               IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
                             W.P.(C) No.27993 of 2024

         Ajit Baran Panda                        ....              Petitioner

                                                Represented By Adv. -
                                          Mr. P.K. Harichandan, Advocate

                                      -versus-

         Deputy Director, DGGI, BBSR             ....      Opposite Parties
         and others
                                                  Represented By Adv. -
                                 Mr. T.K. Satapathy, Sr. Standing Counsel




                               CORAM:
                 THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA
                                         AND
                   THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. SAHOO
                                        ORDER

26.11.2024 W.P.(C) no.27993 of 2024 and I.A. no.15098 of 2004 Order No.

01. 1. Mr. Harichandan, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, impugned is show cause notice dated 1st August, 2024 issued under section 74 of Odisha Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for period commencing from July, 2017 to March, 2024. Referring to, inter alia, sub-section (10) in section 74 he submits, there is prescribed period for issuance of notice as within five years, inter alia, from due date of furnishing of annual return for a Page 1 of 3 // 2 // particular financial year. Furthermore, his client being an unregistered dealer, provision in section 74 does not apply to it.

2. He relies on view taken by a learned single Judge in the High Court of Karnataka in Writ Petition no.15810 of 2024 (T-Res) on judgment dated 4th September, 2024 (Veremax Technologie Services Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax). The learned judge held, consolidation of multiple assessment years into single show cause notice contravenes the provisions. He seeks interference, interim at the stage.

3. Mr. Satapathy, learned advocate, Senior Standing Counsel appears on behalf of revenue and draws attention to definitions section 2(106) to submit, meaning given to 'tax period', when applied to the show cause notice brooks no interference. He submits further, as on date of issuance of the show cause notice, petitioner had obtained registration.

4. Petitioner is relying on view taken by a learned single Judge against consolidation of tax period. In the circumstances, the writ petition requires hearing.

5. Counter be filed by 17th December, 2024 as prayed for by Mr. Satapathy. Petitioner may file rejoinder, to be accepted on adjourned date upon advance copy served.

Page 2 of 3

// 3 //

6. List on 3rd January, 2024. Impugned notice will remain stayed till next date of hearing.

(Arindam Sinha) Judge (M.S. Sahoo) Judge Sks Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: SISIR KUMAR SETHI Reason: Authentication Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT Date: 26-Nov-2024 19:33:39 Page 3 of 3