Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur

Ratan Lal Gurjar &Ors; vs Shri Mukesh Sharma And Others on 22 November, 2016

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR
      RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH JAIPUR

    S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No.1160/2016
                         IN
      S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5412/2015

1. Ratan Lal Gurjar S/o Shri Bhairu Lal Gurjar, aged
  about 54 years, resident of village- Ibrahimpur,
  post- Naner, Tehsil Peeplu, District Tonk.
2. Satya Narayan Dhakad S/o Shri Durga Lal Dhakad,
  aged about 51 years resident of V & PO Bari, Tehsil
  Peeplu, District Tonk.
3. Ram Prakash Jat S/o Shri Ram Lal Jat, aged about
  47 years, resident of village and post-Dhunka
  Kalan, Tehsil Dooni, District Tonk.
4. Ram Phool Gurjar S/o Deva Lal Gurjar, aged about
  53 years, resident of village and post-Harchandera,
  Tehsil Tonk, District Tonk.
5. Bhagwan Sahay Meena S/o Shri Panchu Lal Meena,
  aged about 52 years, resident of village and post-
  Sohela, Tehsil Peeplu, District Tonk.
6. Ramesh Chand Mali S/o Shri Laxmi Narayan Mali,
  aged about 48 years, resident of village and post-
  Mohammad Garh, Tehsil Uniara, District Tonk.
                                                  Petitioners
                           Versus
  1. Mukesh Sharma presently posted as the Principal
  Secretary,   Department       of   Medical   and   Health,
  Secretariat, Jaipur.
  2. B.R. Meena, presently posted as the Director,
  Department    of   Medical     and    Health,    Swasthya
  Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
  3. Shyam Lal Gurjar, presently posted as the
  Additional Director (Adm.), Department of Medical
  and Health, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
                                 Contemnor/Respondents
  Date of Order               :::         22.11.2016

  HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VIJAY KUMAR VYAS

Dr. Vibhuti Bhushan Sharma, for the petitioners.
Mr. Shyam Arya, AAG, for the respondents.


Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that compliance of the impugned order has been made. No other order/direction is required to be passed in his matter.

Hence, the contempt petition is disposed of accordingly.

(VIJAY KUMAR VYAS),J Amit/93