Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati

Ukkalam Sundara Rao, vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 25 August, 2020

Author: Ninala Jayasurya

Bench: Ninala Jayasurya

ee"

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMAR
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY: THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY
-PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAY
WRIT PETITION NO: 13140 OF 2020,

 

rs, OCC Running Tiffin

\, Prakasam District.
Petitioner --

Aged about 49 yea

Between:
luru Manda

Ukkalam Sundara Rao, S/o. Chinna Seshaiah,
Center, R/O. 2-54, Boganampadu, K.Agranaram, Ponna

AND
4. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue
Department, AP. Secretariat, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

2. The District Collector, Ongole, Prakasam District.
ivisi Officer, Kandukuru Revenue Division, Prakasam District.

3. The Revenue Divisional
_Prakasam District.

4. The Tahsildar, Ponnaluru Mandal
5. The Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Ponnaluru Man

District.
6. The Boganampadu Gram Panchay
Boganampadu Village, Ponnaluru Man

7. Shaik Vali, S/o. Alla Saheb, Aged about 44 years,
Kotapadu Agraharam, Boganampadu Village, Ponnaluru Man

District.
8. Pilli Krishna Reddy, S/o. Narapareddy, Aged about 48 years, OCC. Real Estate

Business, Kotapadu Agraharam Boganampadu VI
u Vil
Praksam District 9 p ilage. Ponnaluru Mandal,

dal, Prakasam

at, Rep. by its Panchayat Secretary,

dal, Praksam District.
Occ. Real Estate Business,

dal, Praksam

Respondents

Petition under Article 2% itl
; of the Constitution f Indi
circ . . . 0 India 1
Eo atit of Stater in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court Me i in me
Respondents t ames or any other appropriate Writ or direction declarin peasee. 0
Petitioner's peaceful cccassion and ric well as trying to "ispossesslevict with the
Ac.0.05 cents out of the 'enjoyment of the land admeasun ©
05 o otal extent of Ac.0.18 suring to an extent
running since 35 years 'here! 0.18 cents and the hotel construct
Hotel situated at Kanigiri ein under the Na and style of Swa cted ane
igiri-Kandukur R & B ma Andhra Prad
Boganampadu Villa Main Road, situated | esh
ge, Ponnaluru Mand 7 in Sy. No. 117-5
influence of the Res andal, Prakasam District of
ot pondents 7 & 8 high h ct at the behest
per law, is illegal, arbitrar > nig andedly, without followi and
IS d against the princi ing the proced
the provisions contain y and again® e principals of nat ure as
ed in Articles 19(1 ural Justice and violati
consequently direct (1)(3), 19(1)(g) and 21 violative of
possession and € soy Res Ot end not to interfere with the reaannel and
Me 0.05 cents out of men of the land enjoyment of the land adme ° itioner's peaceful
running since 35 years th otal extent of Ac.0.18 cents and the h asuring to an extent
Hotel situ '3 therein under the nam otel constructed
ated at Kanigiri-K e and style of S and
giri-Kandukur R and B Main Road stuated in Andhra Pradesh

Boganampadu Vil
lage
process of law; ge, Ponnaluru Mandal, Prakasam District without f
ollowing due

1A NO: 1 OF 2020~

Petition under Secti C
affidavit filed in ection 151 CPC pray! |
SU ae ying that
ine ondents not eotcrtere with the Pe the High Sourt may be nloosed Stated in the
e land enjoyment of e Petitioner' eased to di
the land s peaceful possessi irect the
extent of Ac.0.18 admeasuring t session and enj
w ts and th g to an extent Ac.0 njoyment of
under the name ore e hotel constructed .0.05 cents out of
. ; the tot
Kandukur R & and style of Swarna A ed and running since 35 otal
B Main R ' a Andhra Pradesh ; years therei
Ponnaluru Ma oad, situated i sh Hotel situat ein
; ndal, Prak 'Situated in Sy.No.117- ed at Kanigiri-
disposal of the Writ Petition No District without followin : of Boganampadu Vilage
on No.13140 of 2020, onthe file ofthe High C of law, pending
e High Court ng
 

 

The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit
filed in support thereof and the orders of the High Court dated 10-08-2020 & 19-08-2020
made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri MD.Saleem, Advocate for the
Petitioner and Sri Anup Koushik Karavadi, Standing Counsel for the Respondent No.8,
the Court made the following.

ORDER:

"List the matter on 31-08-2020 for filing counter of learned G.P. for Revenue.

Office is directed to put up the counter of Respondent No.8 along with record.

Interim orders, granted on earlier occasion, are extended by two(02) weeks."

Sd/-M.RameshBaby ASSISTANT REGISTRAR IITRUE COPY!/ For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR One CC to SRI.LMD.SALEEM Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] One CC to Sri Anup Koushik Karavadi, Standing Counsel [OPUC] One spare copy To, wn = SP HIGH COURT RRR,J DATED: 25/08/2020 NOTE: LIST THE MATTER ON 31-08-2020 WP.No.13140 of 2020 STATUS QUO EXTENDED

- 2 SEP aed