Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Vallu Singh vs Union Of India & Ors on 9 October, 2017

Author: Rameshwar Singh Malik

Bench: Rameshwar Singh Malik

284
        IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                       CHANDIGARH

                                           CM Nos.10086-88-CI of 2017 in/and
                                           RA-RF No.204-CI of 2017 in
                                           RFA No.187 of 2013
                                           Date of decision: 09.10.2017
Vallu Singh
                                                                    ... Appellant
                                           Vs.


Union of India and others
                                                                 ... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK

Present:    Mr. Vivek Singla, Advocate
            for the applicant-UOI.

                   *******

RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK, J. (ORAL)

CM-10086-CI-2017 Applicant seeks permission to make up the deficiency of Court fee good.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that deficiency of Court fee has been made good.

In this view of the matter, instant application is allowed. CM stands disposed of.

CM-10087-CI-2017 Applicant seeks condonation of delay of 80 days in refiling the review application.

After hearing learned counsel for the applicant, instant application is allowed, for the reasons stated therein. Delay of 80 days in refiling the review application is condoned.

CM stands disposed of.

1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 12-10-2017 04:53:18 ::: CM Nos.10086-88-CI of 2017 in/and -2- RA-RF No.204-CI of 2017 in RFA No.187 of 2013 CM-10088-CI-2017 Applicant seeks condonation of delay of 434 days in filing the review application.

After hearing learned counsel for the applicant, instant application is allowed, for the reasons stated therein. Delay of 434 days in filing the review application is condoned.

CM stands disposed of.

RA-RF-204-CI-2017 After hearing learned counsel for the review applicant and going through the record of the case, no ground for review has been made out. In fact, learned counsel for the review applicant seeks to re-argue the appeal on merits under the garb of this review application, which is not permissible in law. No error apparent on the record has been pointed out in the order dated 23.02.2016 passed by this Court.

Dismissed.

[ RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK ] 09.10.2017 JUDGE vishnu Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No 2 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 12-10-2017 04:53:19 :::