Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Arun Kumar Agarwal vs Anil Agrawal on 1 March, 2019

Bench: N.V. Ramana, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

     SLP(C)No.5215/19                                  1

     ITEM NO.15                            COURT NO.4                    SECTION XVI

                              S U P R E M E C O U R T O F            I N D I A
                                      RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).5215/2019

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 28-09-2018
     in CMJ No.1117/2018 passed by the High Court of Judicature at
     Patna)

     ARUN KUMAR AGARWAL                                                   Petitioner(s)
                                                  VERSUS
     ANIL AGRAWAL                                                         Respondent(s)

     (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.30001/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING
     O.T.)

     Date : 01-03-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR

     For Petitioner(s)             Mr.Jayant Bhushan, Sr.Adv.
                                   Mr.Rohit Kumar Singh, AOR
                                   Mr.Raghavendra P.Singh, Adv.
                                   Mr.Ketan Paul, Adv.
                                   Mr.Tushar Bhushan, Adv.

     For Respondent(s)             Mr.Swetank Shantanu, AOR
                                   Mr.Pratap Shanker, Adv.
                                   Ms.Rishu Agarwal, Adv.
                                   Ms.Indira Goswami, Adv.

                         UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                            O R D E R

Having heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner, we do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution.

Signature Not Verified

The special leave petition is accordingly dismissed. Digitally signed by SATISH KUMAR YADAV Date: 2019.03.02 11:35:41 IST Reason: As a sequel to the above, pending interlocutory application also stands disposed of.

SLP(C)No.5215/19 2

However, keeping in view the fact that the suit is pending since 2013, we direct the trial court to expedite the trial and dispose of the pending suit in accordance with law as early as possible and preferably within a period of one year from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

(SATISH KUMAR YADAV)                                     (RAJ RANI NEGI)
     AR-CUM-PS                                         ASSISTANT REGISTRAR