Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

K.J. Sudhir vs The State Of Kerala on 27 September, 2023

     ITEM NO.29                      REGISTRAR COURT. 2            SECTION XI-A

                                  S U P R E M E C O U R T O F      I N D I A
                                          RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

                                    BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. VIVEK SAXENA

     Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)                  No(s).   7644-7645/2023

     K.J. SUDHIR                                                        Petitioner(s)

                                                   VERSUS
     THE STATE OF KERALA & ORS.                                         Respondent(s)


     Date : 27-09-2023 These petitions were called on for hearing today.


     For Petitioner(s)                  Ms. Krishna Joshi,Adv.
                                        Ms. Diksha Gulauti,Adv.
                                        Dr. Raji Kumar R.,Adv.
                                       Ms. Kheyali Singh, AOR

     For Respondent(s)                 Mr. Anil Soni, Adv.
                                       Mr. Harish Pandey, AOR
                                       Ms. Puggal Renu Gupta, Adv.
                                       Mr. Anshuman Tiwari, Adv.
                                       Ms. Snehil Sonam, Adv.

                                        Mr. Nishe Rajen Shonker,Adv.
                                        Ms. Anu K. Joy,Adv.
                                        Mr. Abraham Mathew,Adv.


                             UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                O R D E R

Despite due service on respondent Nos.1 to 4 and 7 to 9, there is no appearance.

However Mr. Abraham Mathew, Ld. Advocate has appeared on behalf of Mr. Nishe Rajen Shonker, Ld. Advocate-on-Record for respondent Nos. 1, 2, 4, 6 and 9. He seeks and is given four weeks time to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit.

Four weeks time, is granted to respondent Nos.5 and 6, to file counter affidavit.

After expiry of the said period, the matter be processed for Signature Not Verified listing before the Hon’ble Court, as per rules.

Digitally signed by MADHU GROVER Date: 2023.10.03 12:34:44 IST Reason:

VIVEK SAXENA Registrar MG