Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Delhi District Court

Mr. Shikhir Chawla vs Ms. Neeru on 10 February, 2016

CS No. 34/15                                              1                             10.02.2016




                  IN THE COURT OF MS KIRAN GUPTA
              SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE­CUM­RENT CONTROLLER
             NEW DELHI DISTRICT, PATIALA HOUSE COURTS
                              NEW DELHI   

                                                                              CS No.34/15
                                                              Unique ID 02403C00022642015

Mr. Shikhir Chawla 
Proprietor of M/s. Prem Plastic
Having its Registered Office,
At K--88, Udyog Nagar, New Delhi­ 110041
                                                                         .........          Plaintiff

                                                 VERSUS

Ms. Neeru
Proprietor of M/s Metro Packaging
having its office at:
C­127, Naraina Industrial Area
Phase­1, Rex House, Ist Floor,
New Delhi­ 110028.

2. M/s Metro Packaging 
Having its office at 
C­127, Naraina Industrial Area
Phase­I, Rex, House, Ist Floor
New Delhi­ 110028                                                       ..........  Defendants



M/s.Prem Plastics Vs. Ms. Neeru & Anr.                                              Page no. 1 of 5
 CS No. 34/15                             2                               10.02.2016




Date of Institution :  03.02.2015
Date of arguments :  03.02.2016
Date of Judgment  :  10.02.2016                   



               EX­PARTE JUDGMENT 

1              Present suit is for recovery of Rs. 2,92,104/­.


2              The case of plaintiff is that it is a proprietorship firm 
and engaged in business of sales and manufacturing of Printed Poly 
Bags   etc.   Present   suit   has   been   filed   through   its   proprietor   Mr. 
Shikhir Chawla. It is stated that defendant no. 1 is the proprietor of 
defendant no. 2 firm.  Defendant no.1 approached plaintiff in year 
2012 at its registered office for purchase of Printed Plastic Poly Bags 
and   made   various   assertions,   representations   and   assurances 
regarding   the   business   opportunity.     In   terms   of   specific 
understanding   arrived   between   the   parties,   as   and   when 
defendants placed orders for supply of materials, same was duly 
supplied by the plaintiff.  Invoices were raised from time to time. It 
is stated that defendants were under obligation to make payment 
against the invoices, within/on the due date of the invoice, failing 
which   it   was   specifically   agreed,   as   well     as   stipulated   in   the 




M/s.Prem Plastics Vs. Ms. Neeru & Anr.                               Page no. 2 of 5
 CS No. 34/15                             3                              10.02.2016



invoices,   that   the   credit   facility   shall   stand   withdrawn   and 
defendants   shall   be   liable   to   make   payment   immediately   with   a 
further interest @ 24% p.a. on the outstanding amount after due 
date as per mentioned in the invoice till actual payment. 


2.2            It   is   stated   that   as   per   the   books   of   account   of 
defendants maintained by plaintiff, there is outstanding balance of 
Rs. 2,80,870/­.  It is stated that defendants are liable to pay the said 
amount and also interest @ 24 % ie. Rs. 11234/­ on the said amount 
from the date of invoices till  31.08.2014, hence the total liability is 
Rs. 2,92,104/­. 


2.3            Legal   demand   notice   dt.   01.09.2014   was   sent   to   the 
defendants, however despite service defendants have not paid any 
amount, hence the present suit. It is prayed that a decree for the 
sum of Rs.  2,92,104/­ alongwith pendentelite and future interest @ 
24%   per annum  along  with the cost of the suit be passed in its 
favour and against the defendants.


3           The suit was instituted on 03.02.2015. Defendants were 
duly served by way of publication in the Newspaper "Veer Arjun" 




M/s.Prem Plastics Vs. Ms. Neeru & Anr.                               Page no. 3 of 5
 CS No. 34/15                              4                                 10.02.2016



dated 12.12.22015.   However, none appeared for and on behalf of 
defendants despite service and they were proceeded ex­parte vide 
order dt.18.12.2015. 


4           In   support   of   its   case,   plaintiff   has   examined   himself 
(proprietor)   as   PW   1.   He   has   tendered   his   evidence   by   way   of 
affidavit Ex. PW1/A and has relied upon following documents:


            1.

Invoice bearing S. No. 78 dated 18.02.2014 is Ex. PW1/A.

2. Ledger account of plaintiff alongwith certificate under Section 65B of IE Act is Ex. PW1/B(colly).

3. Demand notice dated 01.09.2014 is Ex. PW1/C.

4. Acknowledgment/Tracking report are Ex. PW1/D1­D2 (colly).

5 I have heard counsel for plaintiff and perused the complete record file.



6           From the testimony of PW1 and documents Ex. PW1/A 




M/s.Prem Plastics Vs. Ms. Neeru & Anr.                                  Page no. 4 of 5
 CS No. 34/15                             5                               10.02.2016



i.e. the copy of invoices and Ex. PW/B (colly) ledger account, it is evident that plaintiff had supplied goods to defendants. As per the statement of account Ex. PW 1/B, it is evident that the principal amount of Rs. 2,80,870/­ and interest up till 31.08.2014 was due against the defendants on 31.08.2014. The total outstanding amount of Rs. 2,92,104/­ is still due against the defendants as on 31.08.2014. The present suit is within the period of limitation. The case of plaintiff has remained unrebutted and PW 1 has categorically proved that the sum of Rs. 2,92,104/­ is still outstanding against defendants. The present suit is decreed in favour of plaintiff and against defendants. Defendants are directed to pay Rs. 2,92,104/­ to plaintiff alongwith interest @ 9% per annum (as per prevalent market rate) on the said amount from the date of filing of the suit i.e. 03.02.2015 till realization along with the cost of the suit.

Decree sheet be prepared accordingly.

File be consigned to record room.

Announced in the open                          ( KIRAN GUPTA )
court on 10.02.2016            SCJ­CUM­RC:PHC:NEW DELHI



M/s.Prem Plastics Vs. Ms. Neeru & Anr.                               Page no. 5 of 5