Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Gritec S N C vs Maxim Tubes Company Pvt Ltd on 9 May, 2018

Author: C.L. Soni

Bench: C.L. Soni

         C/COMP/250/2013                                             ORDER




          IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                  R/COMPANY PETITION NO. 250 of 2013

==========================================================
                             GRITEC S N C
                                Versus
                     MAXIM TUBES COMPANY PVT LTD
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR DIGANT M POPAT(5385) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1
MR.D K.PUJ(3836) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1
==========================================================

 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.L. SONI

                                Date : 09/05/2018

                                 ORAL ORDER

1. The present petition is filed under Section 433 and 434 of the  Companies Act, 1956 seeking winding up of Maxim Tubes Company  Pvt.Ltd.­   respondent   company   on   the   ground   that   the   respondent  company is unable to pay its debts to the petitioner.

2. At the hearing of the petition, learned advocates appearing for  the parties have stated before the Court that the parties have arrived at  amicable settlement which is reduced in writing in the form of consent  terms. They have tendered the document of consent terms stated to  have been duly signed on behalf of the respective party, which is taken  on record.

3. The consent terms read as under:

"The Petitioner and the Respondent­Company mutually  agrees   to   amicably   settle   this   matter   on   the   following   Page 1 of 5 C/COMP/250/2013 ORDER consent terms:
"1. The Petitioner has filed the Company Petition no.250   of 2013 before this Hon'ble Court against the Respondent­ Company for a principal sum of Rs.1,28,459.35/­ Euros to   the petitioner, which was alleged to have been due and   payable   on   account   of   commission.   On   behalf   of   the   respondent company, an affidavit in reply was filed on 17  April,   2015   as   well   31   January,   2018,   wherein,   it   has  denied   its   liability   and   requested   this   Hon'ble   Court   to   dismiss the above petition. The petition is pending before   this Hon'ble Court at the notice stage. 
2. During the pendency of petition, parties have decided   to amicably resolve the matter. 
3. Both the parties have agreed at settlement amount of   60,000/­   Euros   (   in   words   Sixty   Thousand   Euros   Only).  The  Respondent­Company will pay 60,000/­ Euros to the   Petitioner towards full and final settlement of the alleged   dues  of  1,28,459.35/­  stated  in the  petition.  It is  further   agreed   between   the   parties   that   the     Respondent­ Company   will   pay   60,000/­   euros   in   four   equal  installments of 15,000/­ Euros (in words fifteen thousand  only) in following schedule. 

Sr.No. Payment Date  Payment Amount (In Euros) 1 05/06/18 15,000/­ 2 25/08/2018 15,000/­ 3 05/11/18 15,000/­ 4 20/01/2019 15,000/­ Total 60,000/­ (In words Sixty Thousand Only)  *Note   :   If   any   date   mentioned   falls   Sunday,   long   weekend   or  Public   holiday then Payment will done on next working day.

Page 2 of 5 C/COMP/250/2013 ORDER

* Since the payment is through bank in foreign currency, all the dates  for above schedule will be +7 days. 

4. It is further agreed between the parties that any charges   like   documentation   charges,   bank   charges   etc.   will   be   borne   by   petitioner   and   respondent   company   both   at   their   respective   sides.   For   instance,   the   Respondent   Company will bear Debit charges and Petitioner will bear   Credit charges. 

5. It is further agreed between parties that if there is any   change   in   payment   schedule   due   to   unavoidable   circumstances,   the   Respondent   Company   will   inform   petitioner will in advance with new date of payment at   least 10 days before due date.

6. The bank account details of the Petitioner are as under: 

Beneficiary :­ Gritec Steel Products and Services s.n.c. Bank   Name:­   INTESA   SANPAOLO   FILIALE   00616­  MILANO 33 Account No:­ 10000 0000 939 Full IBAN:­ IT63 C030 6901 6281 0000 0000 939 BIC/ SWIFT:­ BCITITMM It   is   further   agreed   between   parties   that   if   there   is   any   change   in   petitioner's   bank   details   e.g.   change   in   bank   account number or change in bank etc., petitioner must   inform the Respondent Company in writing by email as   well   registered   mail   at   least   15   days   prior   to   dated   mentioned in payment schedule. 

7. That upon signing these consent terms, Petitioner shall   withdraw Company Petition No.250 of 2013 subject to the  Page 3 of 5 C/COMP/250/2013 ORDER condition   that   Petitioner   shall   be   entitled   to   recive   the   Company   Petition   no.250   of   2013   in   case   of   breach   of  payment schedule by Respondent Company unless in case  of unavoidable circumstances where new date of payment  is worked out by consent of both parties.

8.   The   Petitioner   acknowledges   and   accepts   that   the  amount   of   60,000/­   Euros   is   towards   full   and   final   settlement   of   all   th   claims   raised   in   Company   Petition   No.250 of 2013. The Petitioner shall not be entitled to raise   any   claim,   dispute   or   litigation   with   respect   to   claim   forming   part   of   the   Company   Petition   No.250   of   2013  before   any   Court   and   /or   forum   including   this   Hon'ble   Court."

4. As   stated   in   clause   7   of   the   consent   terms,   upon   signing   the  consent   terms,   the   petitioner   shall   withdraw   the   present   Company  Petition subject to the condition that the petitioner shall be entitled to  revive the present petition in case of breach of payment schedule by  respondent   company   unless   in   case   of   unavoidable   circumstances  where   new   date   of   payment   is   worked   out   by   consent   of   both   the  parties. 

5. In view of the above, learned advocate Mr.Popat appearing for  the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition. Permission  as sought for is granted. The petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. 

Notice discharged. 

6. The   parties   are   directed   to   abide   by   the   consent   terms.   It   is  Page 4 of 5 C/COMP/250/2013 ORDER observed that on breach of the payment schedule for discharge of the  outstanding dues as agreed in the consent terms, it will be open to the  petitioner   to   move   appropriate   application   for   the   revival   of   the  petition. 

(C.L. SONI, J) Manshi Page 5 of 5