Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Patna High Court - Orders

Rajendra Singh@Khiru Singh vs Ajodhya Singh & Ors on 1 March, 2017

Author: Mungeshwar Sahoo

Bench: Mungeshwar Sahoo

                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                      First Appeal No.427 of 1980
                  ======================================================
                  Rajendra Singh@Khiru Singh
                                                                    .... .... Appellant/s
                                                 Versus
                  Ajodhya Singh & Ors
                                                                   .... .... Respondent/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Appellant/s  :    Mr. D.P.Chaudhary
                                            Mr. Dronacharya
                                            Mr. Arjun Prasad Singh

                  For the Respondent/s   :   Mr. Mahendra Pd. Sinha
                                             Mr. Brijnandan Singh
                                             Mr. Lalan Pd. Singh
                                             Mr. S.K.Pd.Sinha
                                             Mr. Ashok Kr. Singh
                                             Mr. Binod Kr. Singh
                                             Mr. Ram Kishore Sinha
                                             Mr. Lal Bihari Singh
                                             Mr. Kumar Alok
                                             Mr. Satyendra Nr.Singh

                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUNGESHWAR
                  SAHOO
                  ORAL ORDER

80   01-03-2017

Heard the learned counsel for the appellant on the interlocutory application No.8169 of 2016.

This substitution application is within time. Accordingly, it is allowed and the legal representatives of the deceased respondent No.6(a) are substituted in place of the deceased respondent No.6.

Since the respondent No.6 was defendant in the Court below and had not challenged the impugned judgment and decree, the appeal shall be heard without service of appeal notice on the newly substituted respondents.

Patna High Court FA No.427 of 1980 (80) dt.01-03-2017

2/2

Accordingly, the service of notice on the substituted respondents are hereby dispensed as the main contesting respondent is the plaintiff respondent No.1.

(Mungeshwar Sahoo, J) Sanjeev/-

U