Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Imtiyaz Fazaluhaque Khan vs The State Of Maharashtra on 3 January, 2019

Author: Prakash D. Naik

Bench: Prakash D. Naik

                                       1 of 3                        23.ABA.2065.2018.doc




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

   CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2065 OF 2018

 Imtiaz Fazalulhaque Khan                                              Applicant
          versus
 The State of Maharashtra                                              Respondent

 Ms.Veena Dubey for applicant.
 Ms.A.A.Takalkar, APP, for State.

                                CORAM :         PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.

                                DATE     :      3rd January 2019
 PC :


 1.       This is an application for anticipatory bail in connection with
 CR No. 408 of 2018 registered with Oshiwara Police Station for the
 offences punishable under Sections 354(A), 509 and 506 of Indian
 Penal Code and Section 12 of POCSO Act.


 2.       The complainant is the niece of the applicant who is aged
 about16 years.           FIR was lodged on 15 th September, 2018.                  It is
 alleged there was a dispute over the property between the applicant
 and the family of the complainant. Applicant is the uncle of the
 victim. On 15th September, 2018 the complainant was proceeding to
 Okaz Shopping Centre at Andheri to attend birthday celebrations of
 her friend Humaira.           At that time complainant met her friend
 Humaira and while talking to her, the applicant accused who was
 standing near Okaz Shopping Center called her.                     Humaira stood
 aside. Accused told complainant that she should go to Mahim and
 should not come to that area. It is further alleged that applicant
 thereafter abused the complainant in filthy                 language and used




::: Uploaded on - 05/01/2019                         ::: Downloaded on - 10/01/2019 02:46:52 :::
                                          2 of 3                     23.ABA.2065.2018.doc


 obscence words as reflected in the First Information Report and
 threatened her for the cool response given by the complainant to him
 and stating that she should not show attitude, otherwise acid will be
 thrown on her face. Subsequently, FIR was lodged.


 3.       Case of the applicant is that the complainant is the daughter of
 his real brother.             His real brother and the applicant's son were
 murdered.          The accused involved in said murder were closely
 associated with Hmaira. Sole intention of the applicant was to inform
 the complainant that she should keep herself away from Humaria. It
 is further submitted that taking the allegations as it is, the offence
 under Section 354A of Indian Penal Code is not made out. It is also
 submitted that there is no physical assault and only on the basis of
 abusive words Section 12 of POCSO Act and provisions of Penal
 Code has been invoked against the applicant. Application preferred
 by the applicant before the Sessions Court has been rejected.


 4.       Learned APP submits that the accused has issued threat of
 throwing acid on the face of the complainant and also used abusive
 language against her.


 5.       The applicant was granted interim protection vide order dated
 6th October 2018. While granting interim protection it was directed
 that the applicant shall attend Oshiwara Police Station as and when
 called by the investigating officer.             It is submitted by learned
 advocate for the applicant that the applicant was not called for
 interrogation by the investigating officer.           While granting interim
 protection it was observed that by order dated 6 th October 2018 there
 is a dispute between the applicant and family of complainant.




::: Uploaded on - 05/01/2019                        ::: Downloaded on - 10/01/2019 02:46:52 :::
                                     3 of 3                       23.ABA.2065.2018.doc


 Applicability of Section 12 of POCSO Act as well as Section 354 of
 IPC is debatable. Considering the nature of offence, the applicant
 was directed to co-operate with the investigation.


 6.       In the circumstances, interim protection granted earlier can be
 confirmed. Hence, I pass following order :


                                  ORDER

(i) Criminal Anticipatory Bail Application No.2065 of 2018 is allowed and disposed off;

(ii) In the event of arrest of applicant in connection with CR No.408 of 2018 registered with Oshiwara Police Station, the applicant be released on bail on furnishing PR bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one or more sureties in the like amount;

(iii) The applicant shall attend the investigating officer of Oshiwara Police Station as and when called by the investigating officer till filing of charge sheet.

(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) MST ::: Uploaded on - 05/01/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 10/01/2019 02:46:52 :::