Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Cni Girls Primary School (Metiabruz) vs The State Of West Bengal & Others on 19 June, 2025

Author: Saugata Bhattacharyya

Bench: Saugata Bhattacharyya

7.
(DL)
       19.06.2025
       Ct. No. 18
        (ARPAN)

                                        W.P.A. 10588 OF 2025

                              CNI Girls Primary School (Metiabruz)
                                              Vs.
                               The State of West Bengal & Others


                              Mr. Kamalesh Bhattacharya, Adv.
                              Mr. Aninda Bhattacharya, Adv.
                                                                      ...for the Petitioner

                              Mr. Bhaskar Prasad Vaisya, AGP
                              Mr. Ranjan Saha, Adv.
                                                                          ...for the State


                                 Affidavit-of-service   filed    on    behalf   of   the

                     petitioner is taken on record.


                                 School authority of CNI Girls Primary School

                     (Metiabruz) is before this court with the present writ

                     petition,     inter   alia,   challenging   memo       dated    18 th

                     September, 2024 issued by the Commissioner of School

                     Education, West Bengal whereby a candidate who was

                     appointed against the vacancy which was alleged to be

                     occupied at one point of time by Karuna Tudu was not

                     accorded approval but approval has been accorded in

                     favour of five other candidates against five sanctioned

                     posts.


                                 Question crops up for consideration whether

                     said Karuna Tudu was appointed against sanctioned

                     vacancy or not.


                                  Issue needs to be decided on exchange of

                    affidavits. Respondents are at liberty to file affidavit-in-

opposition to this writ petition by four (4) weeks from date. Affidavit-in-reply, if any, thereto be filed by one (1) week thereafter.

2

Petitioner shall be at liberty to mention the matter before the appropriate bench for hearing after the time fixed hereinabove for exchanging affidavits.

Learned advocate for the petitioner is directed to communicate this order to the non-appearing respondents by seven (7) days and file further affidavit- of-service on the next date.

(Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)