Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

A.Munirudeen Ahmed vs The Special Commissioner And on 3 July, 2018

Author: T.Raja

Bench: T.Raja

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED :  03.07.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA

W.P.No.16277 of 2018

A.Munirudeen Ahmed				..	Petitioner 

-vs-

1. The Special Commissioner and 
     Principal Secretary to Land Reforms
    Chepauk
    Chennai 600 005

2. The District Collector
    Thiruvallur District

3. The District Revenue Officer
    Gummidipoondi Taluk
    Tiruvallur District

4. The Revenue Divisional Officer
    Gummidipoondi Taluk
    Tiruvallur District

5. The Tahsildar
    Gummidipoondi Taluk
    Tiruvallur District

6. The Revenue Inspector 
    Ponneri, Tiruvallur District

7. The Village Administrative Officer
    No.4, Poovalai Village
    Gummidipoondi Taluk
    Tiruvallur District

8. The Member Secretary
    Poovalai Panchayat Union
    Gummidipoondi Taluk
    Tiruvallur District

9. Chinnavadan
    S/o Samuvel			 		..	Respondents

	Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1 to 8 respondents herein to forthwith to take action as per the representations submitted by the petitioner dated 07.07.2014, 15.12.2014, 09.04.2015 and 08.08.2016 by preventing the 9th respondent Irular community colony by trespassing into the petitioner's patta lands comprised in Survey Nos.106/2, 106/4, 106/13 as a way to ingress and egress to reach the burial ground of Poovalai village, Gummidipoondi Taluk, Tiruvallur District and consequently directing the respondents to pass appropriate orders on his representations.

		For Petitioner		::	Mr.C.A.Syed Ibrahim

		For Respondents		::	Mr.D.Suryanarayanan
							Additional Government Pleader
							for R1 to 7

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed seeking a mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 8 to forthwith take action, as per the representations submitted by the petitioner dated 07.07.2014, 15.12.2014, 09.04.2015 and 08.08.2016, by preventing the 9th respondent Irular community colony from trespassing into the petitioner's patta lands comprised in Survey Nos.106/2, 106/4, 106/13 as a way to ingress and egress to reach the burial ground of Poovalai village, Gummidipoondi Taluk, Tiruvallur District with a consequential direction to the respondents to pass appropriate orders.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the absolute owner of the land covered in Survey No.106/2 having an extent of 0.35.5 Hec., another land covered in Survey No.106/4 having an extent of 0.24.0 Hec., and yet another land covered in Survey No.106/13 having an extent of 1.66.0 Hec., situated at Poovalai Village, Guimmipoondi Taluk, Tiruvallur District. The petitioner is also in possession of the said land and cultivating mango trees and other crops. As the petitioner professes Islam, the said land is being used for performing Islamic rites. While so, according to the petitioner, a resolution has been passed by the local panchayat stating that a portion of the land being in possession of the petitioner for performing Islamic rites may be used by the Irular community people living in the vicinity for burying the dead. In this regard, he has given representations on various dates viz., 7.7.2014, 15.12.2014, 9.4.2015 and the same were not considered.

3. A perusal of the representation dated 9.4.2015 does not appear to show the grievance that the bodies of the people belonging to Irular community are buried in the land belonging to the petitioner. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that by trespassing the petitioner's land as a passage, the Irular community people are carrying the dead that is causing huge mental stress and agony. It is also not there in the representation. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to entertain the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. If the petitioner is aggrieved, he has to workout his remedy by approaching the civil Court. No costs.

Speaking/Non speaking order					 03.07.2018

Index : yes/no

ss


To

1. The Special Commissioner and 
     Principal Secretary to Land Reforms
    Chepauk
    Chennai 600 005

2. The District Collector
    Thiruvallur District

3. The District Revenue Officer
    Gummidipoondi Taluk
    Tiruvallur District

4. The Revenue Divisional Officer
    Gummidipoondi Taluk
    Tiruvallur District

5. The Tahsildar
    Gummidipoondi Taluk
    Tiruvallur District

6. The Revenue Inspector 
    Ponneri, Tiruvallur District

7. The Village Administrative Officer
    No.4, Poovalai Village
    Gummidipoondi Taluk
    Tiruvallur District
8. The Member Secretary
    Poovalai Panchayat Union
    Gummidipoondi Taluk
    Tiruvallur District
T.RAJA, J.

ss






W.P.No.16277 of 2018










03.07.2018