Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Balbir Singh vs Hrtc And Anr on 20 October, 2023

Author: Satyen Vaidya

Bench: Satyen Vaidya

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

                                                 CWP No.          : 7996 of 2023




                                                                     .
                                                 Decided on: 20.10.2023





     Balbir Singh                                                ....Petitioner.

                                         Versus





     HRTC and Anr.                                               ...Respondents.

     Coram




                                           of
     The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge.
     Whether approved for reporting? 1

                  rt
     For the petitioner         :        Mr. Sunny Dhatwalia, Advocate.

     For the respondents            :
                                 Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashisht,

                                 Advocate.
     __________________________________________________________
     Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral)

Notice. Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashisht, learned counsel, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of respondents.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the judgment passed by Division Bench of this Court in CWP No. 4167 of 2019, titled Himachal Road Transport Corporation Vs. Suresh Kumar and Ors., decided on 29.11.2021. He further submits 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

::: Downloaded on - 20/10/2023 20:39:00 :::CIS 2

that the petitioner shall be content in case the respondents are directed to consider the case of the .

petitioner in time bound manner in light of judgment ibid.

3. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of without making any comments on the merits of the of case of the petitioner. It is directed that respondents shall consider the case of the petitioner in light of rt judgment passed by Division Bench of this Court in CWP No. 4167 of 2019, within eight weeks from today and will decide the same by passing a speaking order. In case, the petitioner is found similarly situated as respondents in CWP No. 4167 of 2019, he will also be granted the same benefits as granted to respondents in above referred case.

4. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.




                                              (Satyen Vaidya)
    20th October, 2023                            Judge
         (sushma)




                                         ::: Downloaded on - 20/10/2023 20:39:00 :::CIS