Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati

C Rajasekhar vs State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 6 October, 2020

Author: Jitendra Kumar Maheshwari

Bench: Jitendra Kumar Maheshwari

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) pe

TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY
: PRESENT :
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI JITENDRA KUMAR MAHESHWARI

WRIT PETITION NO: 10174, 10221, 10247, 10268, 10269, 10361 and 10528 OF 2020

W.P. No. 10174 of 2020:

Between:

A.Sashidhar Reddy, S/o. A.\Veera Reddy, aged about 51 years, Senior Assistant, Sri
Mahanandeswara Swamyvari Devasthanam, Mahanandi, Krishna District, A.P.

...Petitioner
AND

1. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Special Chief Secretary to Government,
Revenue (Endowments) Department, A.P Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi,
Guntur District.

2. The Commissioner of Endowments Department(AP), Government of Andhra
Pradesh, Office at Gollapudi, Krishna District, A.P

3. The Executive Officer, Sri Brahmaramba Mallikarjuna Swamyvari Devasthanam,
Srisailam, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to
issue an order or direction, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the
G.O.Rt.No.518 Rev (Vigilance IV) dated 11.06.2020 issued b the {* respondent in so
far as directing the 3 respondent to suspend the petitioner and to file criminal cases
against him, as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and consequently declare the
proceedings in Rc.No.A1/1326-A/2020 dated 11.06.2020 of the 3rd respondent
"suspending the petitioner from service, as illegal and arbitrary and declare that
suspension from service and filing of criminal cases against the petitioner is totally
unwarranted in view of the charges framed in charge memo dated 09.06.2020.

IA NO: 1 OF 2020 |
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the
affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend
G.O.Rt.No.518 Rev (Vigilance IV) dated 11.06.2020 of the 1st respondent and the
consequential order of the 3rd respondent vide proceedings Re.No.A1/1326-A/2020
dated 11.06.2020, pending disposal of WP 10174 of 2020, on the file of the High Court.

WP NO. 10221 OF 2020:

Between:
C Rajasekhar, S/o. Chandragiri Thimmarayudu, aged about. 61 years, Assistant
Executive Officer (Retired), H.No.2-3-155, Srisailam Devasthanam, Srisailam, Kurnool
District
...Petitioner
AND

1. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Special Chief Secretary to Government,
Revenue (Endowments) Department, A.P Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi,
Guntur District.

2. The Commissioner of Endowments Department(AP), Government of Andhra
Pradesh, Office at Gollapudi, Krishna District, A.P

3 The Executive Officer, Sri Brahmaramba Mallikarjuna Swamyvari Devasthanam,
Srisailam, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh.
 

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to
issue an order or direction, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the
G.O.Rt.No.518 Rev (Vigilance IV) dated 11.06.2020 issued b the 1% respondent in so
far as directing the 3° respondent to file criminal cases against the petitioner, as illegal,
arbitrary and without jurisdiction and declare filing of criminal cases against the
petitioner is totally unwarranted in view of the charges framed in charge memo dated
09.06.2020.

IA NO: 1 OF 2020

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the
affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend
G.O.Rt.No.518 Rev (Vigilance IV) dated 11.06.2020 of the 1% respondent, pending
disposal of WP 10221 of 2020, on the file of the High Court.

WP NO. 10247 OF 2020:
Between:

Kovuri Venkateswara Rao, Late K Venkatasubbaiah, aged about 45 years, working as
superintendent, Sri Brahmaramba Mallikarjuna Swamyvari Devasthanam, Srisailam,
Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh.

...Petitioner
AND

4. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Special Chief Secretary to Government,
Revenue (Endowments) Department, A.P Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi,
Guntur District.

2. The Commissioner of Endowments Department(AP), Government of Andhra
Pradesh, Office at Gollapudi, Krishna District, A.P

3. The Executive Officer, Sri Brahmaramba Mallikarjuna Swamyvari Devasthanam,
Srisailam, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to
issue an order or direction, one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the
G.O.Rt.No. 518 (Vigilance IV) dated 11.06.2020 issued by the 18' respondent in so far
as directing the 3° respondent to suspend the petitioner and to file criminal cases
against the petitioner, as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and consequently
declare the proceedings in Rc.No. A1/1326-A/2020 dated 11.06.2020 of the 3°
respondent sus[pending the petitioner from service, as illegal and arbitrary and declare
that suspension from service and fileling criminal cases against the petitioner is totally
unwarranted in view of the charges framed in charge memo dated 09.06.2020 and
direct 3 respondent to give effect to the orders of the 2™ respondent vide proceedings
Rc.No.C1/353628/2020 dated 11.06.2020 transfering the petitioner from 3 respondent
devasthanam. a.

IA NO: 1 OF 2020

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the
affidavit filed in support of the petition, the Hign Court may be pleased to suspend
G.O.Rt.no.518 Rev (Vigilance IV) dated 11.06.2020 of the 1% respondent and the
consequential order of the 3 respondent vide proceedings Rc.No.A1/1326-A/2020
dated 11.06.2020, pending disposal of WP 10247 of 2020, on the file of the High Court.

WP. No. 10268 of 2020:
Between:
 

» §&. Srinivasa Raju, S/o S. Krishnamurthy, aged about 52 years, Senior Assistant,
Sri Brahmaramba Mallikarjuna Swamyvari Devasthanam, Srisailam Kurnool District
Andhra Pradesh

...Petitioner
AND

4. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Special Chief Secretary to Government,
Revenue (Endowments) Department, A.P Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi,
Guntur District.

2. The Commissioner of Endowments Department(AP), Government of Andhra
Pradesh, Office at Gollapudi, Krishna District, A.P

3. The Executive Officer, Sri Brahmaramba Mallikarjuna Swamyvari Devasthanam,
Srisailam, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh.

... Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to
issue an order or direction, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the
G.O.Rt.No.518 Rev (Vigilance IV) dated 11.06.2020 issued by the 4° respondent in so
far as directing the 3 respondent to suspend the petitioner and to file criminal cases
against him, as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and consequently declare the
proceedings in Rc.No.A1/1326-A/2020 dated 11.06.2020 of the 3rd respondent
suspending the petitioner from service, as illegal and arbitrary and declare that
suspension from service and filing of criminal cases against the petitioner is totally
unwarranted in view of the charges framed in charge memo dated 09.06.2020 and
direct the 3% respondent to give effect to the orders of the 2 respondent vide
proceedings Re.No. C1/3536287/2020 dated 41-06-2020 transferring the petitioner from
3" respondent Devesthanam.

IA NO: 1 OF 2020

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the
affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend
G.O.Rt.No.518 Rev (Vigilance IV) dated 11.06.2020 of the 1st respondent and the
consequential order of the 3rd respondent vide proceedings Rc.No.A1/1326-A/2020
dated 11.06.2020, pending disposal of WP 40268 of 2020, on the file of the High Court.

W.P. No. 10269 of 2020: °

Between:

M. Srinivasa Rao, S/o Chinna Subba Rao, aged about 51 years, working as Senior
Assistant, Sri Brahmaramba Mallikarjuna Swamyvari Devasthanam, Srisailam Kurnool
District Andhra Pradesh

.. Petitioner
AND

4. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Special Chief Secretary to Government,
Revenue (Endowments) Department, A.P Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi,
Guntur District.

2. The Commissioner of Endowments Department(AP), Government of Andhra
Pradesh, Office at Gollapudi, Krishna District, AP

3. The Executive Officer, Sri Brahmaramba Mallikarjuna Swamyvari Devasthanam,
Srisailam, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to
issue an order or direction, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the
G.O.Rt.No.518 Rev (Vigilance iV) dated 11.06.2020 issued by the 4§' respondent in so
far as directing the 3" respondent to suspend the petitioner and to file criminal cases
against him, as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and consequently declare the
proceedings in Rc.No.A1/1326-A/2020 dated 11.06.2020 of the 3rd respondent
 

af

' suspending the petitioner from service, as illegal and arbitrary and declare that

suspension from service and filing of criminal cases against the petitioner is totally
unwarranted in view of the charges framed in charge memo dated 09.06.2020 and
direct the 3° respondent to give effect to the orders of the 2™ respondent vide
proceedings Rc.No. C1/3536287/2020 dated 11-06-2020 transferring the petitioner from
3" respondent Devesthanam.

IANO: 1 OF 2020

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the
affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend
G.O.Rt.No.518 Rev (Vigilance IV) dated 41.06.2020 of the 1st respondent and the
consequential order of the 3rd respondent vide proceedings Re.No.A1/1326-A/2020
dated 11.06.2020, pending disposal of WP 40269 of 2020, on the file of the High Court.

W.P. No. 10361 of 2020:
Between:

B. Mallikarjuna Reddy, S/o Late B. Kesava Reddy, aged about 52 years,
Superintendent, Sri Kalahastheeswara Swmyvari Devasthanam, Sri Kalahasthi, Chittoor
District

...Petitioner
AND

4. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Special Chief Secretary to Government,
Revenue (Endowments) Department, A.P Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi,
Guntur District.

2. The Commissioner of Endowments Department(AP), Government of Andhra
Pradesh, Office at Gollapudi, Krishna District, A.P

3. The Executive Officer, Sri Brahmaramba Mallikarjuna Swamyvari Devasthanam,
Srisailam, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to
issue an order or direction, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the
G.O.Rt.No.518 Rev (Vigilance IV) dated 11.06.2020 issued by the 48 respondent in so
far as directing the 3 respondent to suspend the petitioner and to file criminal cases
against him, as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and consequently declare the
proceedings in Ro.No.A1/1326-A/2020 dated 11.06.2020 of the 3rd respondent
suspending the petitioner from service, as illegal and arbitrary and declare that
suspension from service and filing of criminal cases against the petitioner is totally
unwarranted in view of the charges framed in charge memo dated 09.06.2020 and
direct the 3 respondent to give effect to the orders of the 2™ respondent vide
proceedings Rc. NO.C1/3536287/2020 dated 11-06-2020 transferring the petitioner
from 3" respondent devasthanam.

IA NO: 1 OF 2020 ee
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the
affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend
G.O.Rt.No.518 Rev (Vigilance IV) dated 41.06.2020 of the 1st respondent and the
consequential order of the 3 respondent vide proceedings Rc.No.A1/1326-A/2020
dated 11.06.2020, pending disposal of WP 10362 of 2020, on the file of the High Court.

W.P. No. 10528 of 2020:
Between:

M. Savitri, W/o B. Venkata Rao, Record Assistant, Sri Brahmaramba Mallikarjuna
Swamyvari Devasthanm, Srisailam, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh
 

 

...Petitioner
AND

4. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Special Chief Secretary to Government,
Revenue (Endowments) Department, AP Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi,
Guntur District.

2. The Commissioner of Endowments Department(AP), Government of Andhra
Pradesh, Office at Gollapudi, Krishna District, A.P

3. The Executive Officer, Sri Brahmaramba Mallikarjuna Swamyvari Devasthanam,
Srisailam, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh.

.. Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to
issue an order or direction, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the
G.O.Rt.No.518 Rev (Vigilance IV) dated 11.06.2020 issued by the 4°! respondent in so
far as directing the 3 respondent to suspend the petitioner and to file criminal cases
against him, as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and consequently declare the
proceedings in Rc.No.A1/1326-A/2020 dated 11.06.2020 of the 3rd respondent
suspending the petitioner from service, as illegal and arbitrary and declare that
suspension from service and filing of criminal cases against the petitioner is totally
unwarranted in view of the charges framed in charge memo dated 09.06.2020.

1A NO: 1 OF 2020

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the
affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend
G.O.Rt.No.518 Rev (Vigilance IV) dated 41.06.2020 of the 1st respondent and the
consequential order of the 3rd respondent vide proceedings Ro.No.A1/1326-A/2020
dated 11.06.2020, pending disposal of WP 40528 of 2020, on the file of the High Court.

The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit
filed in support thereof and Orders of High Court dated 49-06-2020 & 02.09.2020 made
in WP. No. 10174, 10221 and 10247 of 2020 and 06-07-2020 and upon hearing the
arguments of Sri N Bharat Babu, Advocate for the Petitioner in all petitions, and GP for
Endowments for Respondents Nos 1 and 2, and Sri G.V.Ramana Rao, Standing Counsel
for respondent No.3., the Court made the following

ORDER:

(Through Video Conferencing) "Heard learned counsel for the parties. Interim order passed earlier shall remain in operation until further orders. Immediately on resumption of physical hearing, the case be listed for further orders." . cs Sd/- V. SATYANARAYANA ASSISTANT REGISTRA IITTRUE COPY!/ coe LPR For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To,

4. One CC to Sri. N Bharat Babu, Advocate [OPUC]

2. Two CCs to GP for Endowments, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]

3. One spare copy.

MSB XQ HIGH COURT HCJ DATED: 06.10.2020 ORDER WRIT PETITION NO: 10174, 10221, 10247, 10268, 10269, 10361 and 10528 OF 2020 EXTENSION OF INTERIM ORDER