Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 7]

Chattisgarh High Court

State Of Chhattisgarh vs Deepak Charva 23 Crmp/1679/2019 State ... on 22 July, 2019

Author: Prashant Kumar Mishra

Bench: Prashant Kumar Mishra

                                    1
                                                CRMP No. 1669 of 2019

                                                                NAFR

      HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                      CRMP No. 1669 of 2019

    State of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station - Chando,
      District Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh.

                                                      ---- Applicant

                              Versus

    Deepak Charva S/o Late Rambilash Charva Aged About 24
      Years R/o Village - Kandiri, (Jamkhada), Police Station -
      Chando, District - Balrampur , Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh.

                                                   ---- Respondent




For Applicant-State            :-       Shri Neeraj Mehta, PL


             Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra

             Hon'ble Shri Gautam Chourdiya, JJ.

Order on Board By Prashant Kumar Mishra, J 22/07/2019

1. Heard learned State counsel for the applicant on I.A. No.1, application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, as also on admission.

2. On due consideration, application is allowed and delay of 71 days in filing application, seeking leave to appeal, is condoned. Accordingly, I.A. No.1 is allowed. 2 CRMP No. 1669 of 2019

3. The trail Court has acquitted the accused of the charges under Sections 365, 366, 376(2)(ढ), 506-B of IPC.

4. Bare perusal of the statement of the prosecutrix would reveal that she admits about consensual relation with the accused. She further admits that the report was lodged because her parents came to know about the affair/incident. Prosecutrix being a married lady aged about 28 years, there is no point in entertaining this application seeking leave to appeal.

5. Accordingly, Cr.M.P. is dismissed.

                   Sd/-                              Sd/-
        (Prashant Kumar Mishra)              (Gautam Chourdiya)
                Judge                             Judge
Ankit