Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Securities Appellate Tribunal

Indian Infotech & Software Ltd. vs Sebi on 24 August, 2017

Author: J.P. Devadhar

Bench: J.P. Devadhar

     BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                     MUMBAI
                                                 Date of Decision: 24/08/2017


                                     Appeal No.200 of 2017

Indian Infotech & Software Ltd.
Room No.122, 1st Floor,
Sitladevi CHS Ltd.,
D.N. Nagar, Ambivali,
Andheri (West),
Mumbai - 400 053.                                      ... Appellant

      Versus

1.

BSE Ltd.

P.J. Tower, Dalal Street, Mumbai - 400 001.

2. Securities and Exchange Board of India SEBI Bhavan, Plot No.C-4A, G Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai - 400 051. ... Respondents Mr. J.J. Bhatt a/w Ms. Nikita Hinger, Advocates i/b R. V. Legal for the Appellant.

Mr. Ajay Khaire a/w Mr. Nair Renjith Ramesh, Advocates i/b The Law Point for Respondent No.1.

Mr. Tomu Francis and Mr. Vivek Shah, Advocates for Respondent No.2. CORAM : Justice J.P. Devadhar, Presiding Officer Dr. C.K.G. Nair, Member Per : Justice J.P. Devadhar (Oral)

1. This appeal is filed inter alia to challenge the communication of Securities and Exchange Board of India (for short 'SEBI') dated 7th August, 2017 as also the Order dated 7/8/2017 issued by Bombay Stock Exchange Ltd. in compliance with the directions contained in the SEBI Communication dated 7th August, 2017.

2

2. As the appellant has already made a representation to SEBI against the said ex-parte order dated 7th August, 2017, Counsel for the appellant on instruction seeks to withdraw the appeal with liberty to pursue the representation filed before SEBI. Accordingly, we permit the appellant to withdraw the appeal with liberty to pursue the representation pending before SEBI.

3. SEBI is directed to dispose of the representation made by the appellant as expeditiously as possible and in any event within a period of four weeks from today. It is made clear that passing of any order on the representation made by the appellant would not preclude SEBI from further investing the matter and initiate appropriate proceedings if deemed fit.

4. Appeal is disposed of in the aforesaid terms with no order as to costs.

Sd/-

Justice J.P. Devadhar Presiding Officer Sd/-

Dr. C.K.G. Nair Member 24/08/2017 prepared & compared by-dg