Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

G.Mohan vs Government Of Tamil Nadu on 23 November, 2021

Author: K.Kalyanasundaram

Bench: K.Kalyanasundaram, V.Sivagnanam

                                                                       W.P.No.23884 of 2021

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED: 23.11.2021

                                                      CORAM:

                           THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
                                                and
                              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM

                                               W.P.No.23884 of 2021

                     G.Mohan                                                 ...Petitioner

                                                         Vs.

                     1.Government of Tamil Nadu,
                       Rep. by Secretary to Government,
                       Welfare of Differently abled person,
                       (DAP-3.1) Dept. Secretariat,
                       Chennai – 600 009.

                     2.The State Commissioner for Differently abled,
                       No.5, Kamarajar Salai,
                       Lady Willington College Campus,
                       Chennai – 600 005.

                     3.The Block Development Officer,
                       Villivakkam Panchayat Union,
                       MTH Road, Ambattur,
                       Chennai – 600 053.

                     4.The Panchayat Secretary,
                       Vanagaram Panchayat,
                       Vanagaram, Chennai – 600 095.


                     1/6


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                     W.P.No.23884 of 2021

                     5.G.Shankar                                                   ...Respondents
                           Prayer :             Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution
                     of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the
                     respondents 1 and 2 to consider the representation dated 20.10.2020 of the
                     petitioner to take necessary action against the abuse committed by 5th
                     respondent.


                                          For petitioner   : Mr.G.Ponniakoti
                                          For respondents : Mr.L.S.M.Hasan Fizal
                                                            Additional Government Pleader
                                                            (for R1 & R2)
                                                            Dr.S.Suriya
                                                            Govt. Counsel (for R3)



                                                               ORDER

(The Order of the Court was made by K.KALYANASUNDARAM,J) Heard Mr.G.Punniakoti, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.L.S.M.Hasan Fizal, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 and Dr.S.Suriya, learned Government Counsel appearing for the third respondent.

2/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.23884 of 2021

2.The petitioner has come up with this writ petition seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to consider his representation dated 20.10.2020 within a time framed.

3.The petitioner claims to be a disabled person having disability of 80%. His daughter, by name, Selvi Jeyanthi is also disabled person. The grievance of the petitioner is that they are not able to use three wheeler cycle in the public road having 6 feet breadth and 300 meter length in Ward No.9, Tiruvallur First Cross Street. In this regard, a complaint was lodged with the respondents, but no action was taken.

4.When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the third respondent/Block Development Officer has filed a status report stating that on 13.11.2021, an inspection was conducted along with Assistant Engineer, Villivakkam Panchayat Union and Panchayat Secretary to Vanagaram Panchayat, in which, they found that the main entrance of the petitioner is located in Kamatchi Amman Nagar and the street is paved with cement road which is 24 feet and it is used by the public. The plot located in the back 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.23884 of 2021 side of the petitioner's house belongs to one Sankar and patta was issued in his name. It is also stated that it is not a common pathway.

5.The status report filed by the third respondent is not seriously disputed by the petitioner.

6.In the light of the above fact, we find no merit in this writ petition.

Hence, this writ petition fails and the same is dismissed. No costs.

                                                                           [M.K.K.S.J]     [V.S.G.J]
                                                                                   23.11.2021
                     skn
                     Index              : Yes/No
                     Internet           : Yes/No

                     To

                     1.The Secretary to Government,

Welfare of Differently abled person, (DAP-3.1) Dept. Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.

2.The State Commissioner for Differently abled, No.5, Kamarajar Salai, Lady Willington College Campus, Chennai – 600 005.

4/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.23884 of 2021

3.The Block Development Officer, Villivakkam Panchayat Union, MTH Road, Ambattur, Chennai – 600 053.

4.The Panchayat Secretary, Vanagaram Panchayat, Vanagaram, Chennai – 600 095.

5/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.23884 of 2021 K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J and V.SIVAGNANAM, J skn W.P.No.23884 of 2021 23.11.2021 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis