Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Tamil Nadu Generation And Distribution ... vs K. Ramalingam on 5 July, 2021

Bench: S. Abdul Nazeer, Krishna Murari

     ITEM NO.5                   Court 8 (Video Conferencing)                   SECTION XII

                                  S U P R E M E C O U R T O F           I N D I A
                                          RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)                       No(s).    4680/2021

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 10-01-2020
     in WA No. 1045/2016 passed by the High Court of Judicature at
     Madras)

     TAMIL NADU GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION
     LTD. & ANR.                                        Petitioner(s)

                                                       VERSUS

     K. RAMALINGAM & ORS.                                                      Respondent(s)

     (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.40768/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING
     C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)

     Date : 05-07-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER
                           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI


     For Petitioner(s)                  Mr.   P.S.Narasimha,Sr.Adv.
                                        Mr.   D.Kumanan,Adv.
                                        Mr.   Aman Shukla,Adv.
                                        Ms.   Aditi Tripathi,Adv.
                                        Mr.   Vinodh Kanna B., AOR

     For Respondent(s)



                            UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                               O R D E R

We have heard Mr. P.S.Narasimha, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners.

The High Court in exercise of its discretionary jurisdiction has directed the petitioner-TANGEDO to issue Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Anita Malhotra Date: 2021.07.06 Appointment Order in favour of the first respondent-Mr. 16:53:51 IST Reason: K.Ramalingam, S/o M.Kuzhanthaivelly. The High Court has 1 further clarified that if respondent No.1 is not inclined to join within the prescribed time as given in the Appointment Order, no further equity or benefit will accrue to him. The High Court has also clarified that the appointment is made in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case and the direction to appoint will not in any way affect the merits of the contentions which may be raised by the petitioner-Corporation in such other cases and will not act as a precedent for such other cases at all.

In view of the above, we decline to entertain this petition. It is, accordingly, dismissed.

Pending application shall also stand disposed of.

(ANITA MALHOTRA)                                         (KAMLESH RAWAT)
  COURT MASTER                                            COURT MASTER




                                     2