Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Google India Private Ltd vs Pravin Upadhyay And Ors on 23 August, 2022

Author: Sandeep K. Shinde

Bench: Sandeep K. Shinde

                                                              29-IA-17558-2022.docx

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                  INTERIM APPLICATION NO.17558 OF 2022
          Digitally
          signed by                                IN
          SHAMBHAVI
SHAMBHAVI NILESH            CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION (ST) NO.15826 OF 2022
NILESH    SHIVGAN
SHIVGAN   Date:
          2022.08.24
          10:00:09
          +0530
                       Google India Private Ltd.                          ..... Applicant
                            Vs.
                       Pravin Upadhyay and Ors.                           ....Respondents

                                                       ....
                       Mr. E. Naushad with Ms. Padmaja Dholakia with Ms. Charushila
                       More and Ms. Sarika G. for the Applicant.

                                             CORAM: SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.

DATED : AUGUST 23, 2022 P.C.

1. Heard learned counsel for the Applicant. This Revision Application challenges the order dated 1st February, 2022 passed below Exhibit 10 in Regular Civil Suit No.942 of 2018. The subject Suit is instituted by the Respondent No.1 for damages, permanent injunction and mandatory injunction wherein the Applicant is Defendant No.3. Applicant moved an application under Order 1 Rule 10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for deleting his name as Defendant in the subject Suit. The learned Trial Court rejected the said application on 1st February, 2022. Interim application seeks condonation of delay caused in preferring Revision against the said order. Shivgan 1/2

29-IA-17558-2022.docx

2. Heard learned counsel for the Applicant.

3. Issue notice to the Respondents returnable on 22nd September, 2022. In addition to the Court notice, applicant shall serve contesting Respondents by Humdust.

4. Having regard to the facts of the case and in view of the orders passed by this Court in Chamber Summons No.874 of 2015 in Suit No.145 of 2015; Chamber Summons No.92 of 2016 in Suit No.502 of 2015 and in Interim Application in Writ Petition (L) No.12318 of 2021, prima-facie, I am of the view that the Applicant was neither necessary nor proper party in the Suit instituted by the Respondent No.1.

5 For these reasons, till the returnable date, Trial Court shall not pass any adverse order against the Applicant/Defendant No.3 in the subject Suit.

(SANDEEP K. SHINDE J.) Shivgan 2/2