Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 10, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Sameer Ramdas Walunj vs The State Of Maharashtra on 22 January, 2019

Author: Nitin W. Sambre

Bench: Nitin W. Sambre

                                          1                             22.1113.18 aba.doc

ISM
                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                      CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

             ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1113 OF 2018

      Sameer Ramdas Walunj                                        .....Applicant

             V/s.

      The State of Maharashtra                                    .....Respondent

                                 WITH
                  CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 814 OF 2018
                                   IN
             ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1113 OF 2018

      Arjun Ramchandra Walunj                                     ....Intervener

      IN THE MATTTER BETWEEN

      Sameer Ramdas Walunj                                        .....Applicant

             V/s.

      The State of Maharashtra                                    .....Respondent

      Mr. Ramesh Tripathi advocate for the applicant
      Mr. Shailesh Kharat for the intervener
      Mr. A. A. Palkar APP for the State

                                      CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE : JANUARY 22, 2019.

::: Uploaded on - 24/01/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 24/01/2019 23:34:22 ::: 2 22.1113.18 aba.doc P.C. Heard respective counsel.

2 In Crime No. 153/2018 registered with Manchar Police Station, Pune Rural for offence punishable under Sections 326, 325, 323, 504, 506, 143, 147, 148, 149, 135 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 37 (1) (3), 135 of Mumbai Police Act, applicant is seeking pre-arrest bail.

3 The role attributed to the applicant in crime in question is use of stick and by stone. The contents in the F.I.R. in the aforesaid effect if appreciated, there is no specific role attributed to the applicant of assault to anybody. What is alleged is applicant tried to assault brother of complainant Vithal by stone, however, Vilas, the co-accused intervened in the matter. 4 In the aforesaid background and having regard to the fact that there is cross complaint, in absence of any criminal antecedents, Ad- interim protection granted to the applicant vide order dated 12/06/2018 stands confirmed.

::: Uploaded on - 24/01/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 24/01/2019 23:34:22 :::

3 22.1113.18 aba.doc 5 Application stands disposed of.

6 Intervention application also stands disposed of.

[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.] ::: Uploaded on - 24/01/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 24/01/2019 23:34:22 :::