Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Kerala High Court

G.Krishnaveni vs Tahsildar(Rr) on 25 May, 2007

       

  

  

 
 
                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                             PRESENT:

                         THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH

                    TUESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF MAY 2013/131ST VAISAKHA 1935

                                    WP(C).No. 12124 of 2013 (M)
                                       ----------------------------

PETITIONER(S):
--------------------------

            G.KRISHNAVENI, AGED 54 YEARS
            W/O.R.GANESH, PROPRIETOR, M/S.VISWAPRADEEPA INDUSTRIES
            VELANTHAVALAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.

            BY ADVS.SRI.G.HARIHARAN
                        SRI.PRAVEEN.H.

RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------

       1. TAHSILDAR(RR)
            CHITTUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN 678101.

       2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER
            OZHALAPATHY VILLAGE, VELANTHAVALAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT
            PIN 678557.

       3. DISTRICT INDUSTRIES OFFICER
            DISTRICT INDUSTRIES CENTRE, PALAKKAD-678001.

       4. DISTRICT COLLECTOR
            PALAKKAD-678001.

       5. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT
            FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

       6. STATE OF KERALA
            REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT
            INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

            R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.M SANEER

            THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21-05-
2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 12124 of 2013 (M)
----------------------------

                                           APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
-------------------------------------

EXHIBIT-P1: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER MADE G.O.(RT)NO.679/07/ID DATED 25.05.2007.

EXHIBIT-P2: TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 17.06.2009 SENT BY THE
                     DIRECTOR OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
                     TO THE HON'BLE INDUSTRIES MINISTER.

EXHIBIT-P3: TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 28.01.2011 MADE BY THE
                     PETITIONER BEFORE THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALAKKAD.

EXHIBIT-P4: TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 26.03.2011 EVIDENCING PAYMENT
                     OF RS.50,000/-.

EXHIBIT-P5: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 24.4.2012 SENT BY THE
                     PETITIONER.

EXHIBIT-P6:          TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST MADE BY THE MLA SRI.K.ACHUTHAN,
                     REPRESENTING CHITTUR CONSTITUENCY ADDRESSED TO THE
                     HON'BLE INDUSTRIES MINISTER ON 26.04.2012.

EXHIBIT-P7: TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 09.05.2012 SENT BY THE
                     HON'BLE INDUSTRIES MINISTER ADDRESSED TO SRI.K.ACHUTHAN MLA,
                     REPRESENTING CHITTUR CONSTITUENCY.

EXHIBIT-P8:          COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 04.02.2013 ISSUED UNDER SECTION 49 OF
                     THE REVENUE RECOVERY ACT.

EXHIBIT-P9: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT ON
                     04.03.2013 GRANTING INSTALMENT FACILITIES.

EXHIBIT-P10: TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 12.03.2013 MADE BEFORE THE 6TH
                     RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS
---------------------------------------                          NIL




                                                    TRUE COPY


                                                    P.A TO JUDGE
SMM



                     V.CHITAMBARESH,J.
                    = = = = = = = = = = =
                    W.P.(C) No.12124 of 2013
             = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = =
              Dated this the 21st day of May, 2013

                       J U D G M E N T

All that the petitioner prays at the time of hearing is a disposal of Ext.P10 representation pending with the sixth respondent in regard to the waiver of a margin money loan.

2. I direct the sixth respondent to consider Ext.P10 representation with notice to the petitioner if the same is still pending. The needful shall be done within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The writ petition is disposed of.

V.CHITAMBARESH.

JUDGE smm