Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Patna High Court - Orders

Sanju Chouhan @ Sanchay Chouhan vs The State Of Bihar on 13 September, 2022

Author: Prabhat Kumar Singh

Bench: Prabhat Kumar Singh

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25762 of 2022
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-309 Year-2019 Thana- KISHANGANJ District- Kishanganj
                 ======================================================
                 Sanju Chouhan @ Sanchay Chouhan Son of Ram Prasad Chouhan Resident
                 of Village - Paschim Baluchukka, P.s.- Panjipara (Goalpokhar), Distt.- Uttar
                 Dinajpur (West Bengal).


                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s

                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Raj Kumar
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Satya Nand Shukla
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   13-09-2022

Heard both parties.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Kishanganj P.S. Case No. 309 of 2019, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 384, 386, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, petitioner along with others are alleged to have extorted money from truck drivers.

It is submitted that petitioner has been made accused on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused who were apprehended on the spot. No incriminating article has been recovered from possession of this petitioner. None of the drivers or owners has named this petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25762 of 2022(2) dt.13-09-2022 2/2 Counsel for State however vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and submitted petitioner is named in the FIR and has got four criminal antecedents.

Considering the facts aforesaid and criminal antecedents of the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner above-named on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/-

U        T