Delhi High Court - Orders
M/S Simpark Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation on 6 April, 2022
Author: Yashwant Varma
Bench: Yashwant Varma
$~10
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 5055/2022 & CM APPL. 15019/2022 (for stay)
M/S SIMPARK INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Vishal Singh and Ms. Jyoti Bajaj,
Advs.
versus
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharval, SC for SDMC
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA
ORDER
% 06.04.2022
1. Learned counsel for parties apprise the Court that the issues raised in this writ petition stand concluded in favor of the petitioner in light of the order made by learned Judge in W.P.(C)4730/2022. That writ petition was disposed of in the following terms:
"1. Petitioner impugns circular dated 17.02.2022 informing the petitioner that the competent authority by order dated 03.02.2022 has decided to debar the petitioner for a period of two years from participation in any bid/tender of the respondent South Delhi Municipal Corporation.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no show cause notice was issued to the petitioner prior to issuance of the alleged order dated 03.02.2022 or the impugned circular dated 17.02.2022. He further submits that copy of the order dated 03.02.2022 has not even served on the petitioner.
3. Learned counsel for the respondent disputes the same.
4. Learned counsel for respondent submits that the competent authority was constrained to pass the order in view of the conduct of the petitioner.
5. He without prejudice submits that in view of the technical objection taken by the petitioner that no show cause notice was issued prior to passing of the debarment order, the competent authority has decided to revoke the debarment order reserving the right of the Corporation to issue a show cause notice to the petitioner and then to pass a fresh order in accordance with law.Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:NEHA Signing Date:08.04.2022 17:36:21
6. In view of the above, the order dated 03.02.2022 and the circular dated 17.02.2022 is set aside. This would be without prejudice to the right of the respondent to issue a show cause notice to the petitioner for any alleged infraction. Respondent shall dispose of the show cause notice in accordance with law. All rights and contentions of parties are reserved.
7. It is clarified that this Court has neither considered nor commented upon the merits of the contention of either party."
2. Accordingly, and in light of the submissions noted above, this writ petition shall also stand allowed on identical terms. The order dated 03 February 2022 and the circular dated 17 February 2022 is set aside. This would be without prejudice to the right of the respondent to issue a show cause notice to the petitioner for any alleged infraction. Respondent shall dispose of the show cause notice in accordance with law. All rights and contentions of parties are reserved. It is clarified that this Court has neither considered nor commented upon the merits of the contention of either party.
3. Pending application also stands disposed of.
YASHWANT VARMA, J.
APRIL 6, 2022/neha Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:NEHA Signing Date:08.04.2022 17:36:21