Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Narottam Mishra vs Rajendra Bharti on 1 September, 2014

Bench: Madan B. Lokur, Abhay Manohar Sapre

     ITEM NO.201                                   COURT NO.12                    SECTION XVII

                                    S U P R E M E C O U R T O F           I N D I A
                                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)                         No(s).   14984/2010

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 26/03/2010
     in IA No. 1327/2010 in EP No. 26/2009 passed by the High Court Of
     M.P At Gwalior)

     NAROTTAM MISHRA                                                           Petitioner(s)

                                                         VERSUS

     RAJENDRA BHARTI                                Respondent(s)
     (With appln. (s) for bringing on record subsequent event and
     exemption from filing O.T. of annexures and permission to file
     additional documents and vacating stay and interim relief and
     office report)
     (For Final Disposal)

     Date : 01/09/2014                      This petition was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :                                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR
                                            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE

     For Petitioner(s)                      Mr. T.S. Doabia, Sr. Adv.
                                            Mr. Navin Chawla,Adv.
                                            Mr. A. Maheshwari, Adv.

     For Respondent(s)                      Mr. B. K. Satija,Adv.


                           UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

                                                      O R D E R

Learned counsel for the respondent / election petitioner says that he has moved an application for withdrawing the election petition.

Learned counsel for the petitioner / returned candidate says that two other voters have moved an application in the High Court for substitution.

Signature Not Verified

That application is not taken up because of the Digitally signed by Meenakshi Kohli Date: 2014.09.02 interim order passed on 5th July, 2010 staying the proceedings in 12:31:10 IST Reason:

the election petition pending in the High Court. 1 Learned counsel for the petitioner says that in view of these developments, the interim order may be vacated so that the High Court may further proceed in the matter and decide the pending applications.
Under the circumstances, we vacate the interim order passed on 5th July, 2010 and make it clear that the interim order is vacated for the limited purpose of enabling the High Court to decide the pending interim applications.
The special leave petition is disposed of as withdrawn.




(MEENAKSHI KOHLI)                           (JASWINDER KAUR)
  COURT MASTER                                COURT MASTER




                                2