Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court

Rdg Interior Decoration Exterior ... vs Cricket Association Of Bengal on 24 July, 2009

Author: Patherya

Bench: Patherya

                                        GA No. 1759 of 2009
                                        With
                                        CS No. 191 of 2009

                                IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                                  Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction
                                          ORIGINAL SIDE




              RDG INTERIOR DECORATION EXTERIOR ARCHITECTURE PRIVATE LTD.

                                                Versus

                               CRICKET ASSOCIATION OF BENGAL



  BEFORE:

  The Hon'ble JUSTICE PATHERYA

  Date : 24th July, 2009.
                                              Mr. R. Banerjee, Adv.
                                              Mr. Probal Mukherjee, Adv.
                                                        ..... for petitioner.
                                              Mr. R. Bachawat, Adv.
                                              Mr. Amitesh Banerjee, Adv.
                                                         .........for respondent.

The Court :- In view of joint measurements annexed to the petition and accepted by the petitioner the order dated 9.7.2009 is vacated. Counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the order vacated this day monies be kept apart earmarked to the said suit or in an escrow account.

Such prayer of the petitioner is disputed by counsel for the respondent who submits that the petitioner's claim in the suit is a money claim. In fact no sum is payable to the petitioner as sums far in excess of the quoted sum has been paid to the petitioner and sums are refundable to the respondent.

The fact of over payment and sums refundable are disputed by the counsel for the petitioner.

Having considered the submissions of the parties regarding keeping aside sums of monies this prayer cannot be allowed at this stage as the suit filed is for a money decree and 2 without a proper calculation being made of sums paid and outstandings no order can be passed at this stage directing sums to be kept apart.

Accordingly, directions are given for filing affidavit. Affidavit-in-opposition be filed within three weeks, affidavit-in-reply within three weeks thereafter.

Matter to appear in the list eight weeks hence.

All parties are to act on a xerox signed copy of this order on the usual undertakings.

(PATHERYA, J.) GH.