Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Calcutta High Court

Keshar Deo Agarwal vs The Income Tax Settlement Commission ... on 3 June, 2014

Author: Arindam Sinha

Bench: Arindam Sinha

ORDER SHEET
                               GA No. 1505 of 2014
                                      WITH
                               WP No. 1048 of 2004

                       IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                         Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction
                                ORIGINAL SIDE



                     KESHAR DEO AGARWAL
                            Versus
THE INCOME TAX SETTLEMENT COMMISSION (I.T. & W.T.) ADDL BENCH, KOL


  BEFORE:
  The Hon'ble JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA
  Date : 3rd June, 2014.


                                                                       Appearance :
                                                           Mr. Sanjoy Bhowmik, Adv.
                                                            Mr. Siddharth Das, Adv.
                                                                  Mr. C.S. Das, Adv.
                                                                 ...for the petitioner.

                                                            Mr. P.K. Bhowmick, Adv.
                                                                ...for the respondent.

The Court : G.A. No. 1505 of 2014 is an application for substitution of the deceased petitioner by his legal representatives.

The applicant No. 3 is the widow, the applicant Nos. 1 and 2 are the sons and the applicant Nos. 4 and 5 are the daughters of the deceased petitioner. Causes shown in the application are that on 3rd April, 2014 the writ petition was listed for hearing when the learned advocate engaged by the petitioner sought to contact the writ petitioner whereupon his legal representatives responded by 2 supplying the information to the said learned advocate that the petitioner had died on 25th October, 2010.

Mr. Sanjoy Bhowmik, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that in the time between 25th October, 2010 and 3rd April, 2014, the matter was not listed.

Mr. P.K. Bhowmick, learned advocate on behalf of the respondent appears and submits that the conduct of the applicants speaks of gross negligence. Be that as it may, the causes shown for not taking steps to have the substitution effected earlier are accepted.

Let the death of the deceased petitioner be recorded and the applicants be substituted in his place. G.A. No. 1505 of 2014 is allowed.

It appears that the records are not readily available. The substituted petitioners are directed to make ready copies of the pleadings and furnish them on the adjourned date for the purpose of reconstruction of the records.

Let the writ petition be listed for hearing on 17th June, 2014.

(ARINDAM SINHA, J.) akb/