Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

The Travancore Devaswom Board vs State Of Kerala on 23 November, 2015

Author: A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar

Bench: A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                          PRESENT:

               THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR

           MONDAY,THE 23RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/2ND AGRAHAYANA, 1937

                                 WP(C).No. 14798 of 2015 (Y)
                                    ----------------------------

PETITIONER:
---------------------

            THE TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD
            NANTHANKODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695003
            REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY IN CHARGE

            BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM

RESPONDENTS:
-----------------------

        1. STATE OF KERALA
            REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO
            GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE(DEVASWOM)
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001

        2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001

        3. THE TAHSILDAR
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DIST

        4. SMT N.N. PADMAJA
            HOUSE NO 51, SREE NAGAR, PARUTHIPPARA
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT

            R4 BY ADV. SRI.RAM MOHAN.G.
            R4 BY ADV. SRI.G.P.SHINOD
            R4 BY ADV. SRI.MANU V.
            R4 BY ADV. SRI.GOVIND PADMANAABHAN
            R1-R4 BY SRI LILLY K.T., GOVERNMENT PLEADER

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23-11-2015, THE
COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 14798 of 2015 (Y)
----------------------------

                                           APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
-------------------------------------

P1:-      COPY OF THE RESOLUTION NO R O C 7546/05/LAND DTD 22/11/2005

P2:-      COPY OF THE DETAILS OF LAND REQUIRED AS INTIMATED TO THE DISTRICT
          COLLETOR, IN FORM NO 2 OF SECTION 4(1) OF THE ACT

P3:-      COPY OF THE LOCATION SKETCH OF THELANDS PROPOSED TO BE
          ACQUIRED AS PREPARED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER

P4:-      COPY OF THE INSPECTION REPORT ON THE LAND RELATED MATTERS OF
          TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, SUBMITTED BY THE LAND SPECIAL
          OFFICER, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, TRIVANDRUM DTD 18/1/2007

P5:-      COPY OF THE ORDER NO R O C NO 7546/LAND DTD 28/7/2008

P6:-      COPY OF THE LAND VALUE CERTIFICATE NO B11-4784/08/L.DIS DTD 3/2/2008

P7:-      COPY OF THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD DTD 4/4/2009

P8:-      COPY OF THE RESOLUTION PASSED BY THE BOARD ON 24/5/2011

P9:-      COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER NO ROC 7546/05/L DTD 6/6/2011

P10:- COPY OF THE REPORT DTD 7/10/2011 GIVEN BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

P11:-     COPY OF THE REPORT DTD 8/5/2012

P12:- COPY OF THE REPORT DTD 23/5/2012 IN TDB REPORT NO 80/2012 IN DBP NO
          40/2009 DTD 23/5/2012

P12(A):-COPY OF THE ORDER DTD 25/3/2013 IN DBP NO 40 OF 2009

P13:- COPY OF THE REPORT DTD 13/6/2013 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE BOARD BY
          THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE ENGINEER(ESTATE DIVISION)AND EXECUTIVE
          ENGINEER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

P14:- COPY OF THE LETTER NO 27888/DEV.2/2011/RD DTD 10/10/2013

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS: N I L
---------------------------------------




//TRUE COPY//

PA TO JUDGE

JV



              A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.
              ----------------------------------------------
                    W.P.(C).No.14798 of 2015
              ----------------------------------------------
          Dated this the 23rd day of November, 2015


                             JUDGMENT

The challenge in the writ petition is against Ext.P14 order that is passed by the 1st respondent in response to a request by the petitioner Board for acquisition of certain lands by invoking the provisions of the Kerala Land Acquisition Act.

2. By Ext.P14 order passed by the 1st respondent, the request of the petitioner was denied. The sole ground urged on behalf of the petitioner, at the time of hearing, is that Ext.P14 order was passed without hearing the petitioner and therefore is vitiated by a non-compliance with the rules of natural justice.

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Government Pleader for respondents 1 to 3.

4. The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, would submit that the 1st respondent has no objection in hearing the W.P.(C) No. 14798/2015 2 petitioner and passing a fresh order in the matter. Taking note of the said submission of the learned Government Pleader on instructions, I quash Ext.P14, and direct the 1st respondent to pass fresh orders on Ext.P9 request preferred by the petitioner for acquisition of lands, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner and the 4th respondent.

The writ petition is disposed as above.

SD/-

                                A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
JV                                          JUDGE