Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Jaspal Kaur & Others vs State Of Punjab & Others --Respondents on 14 December, 2012

Author: Tejinder Singh Dhindsa

Bench: Tejinder Singh Dhindsa

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT
                            CHANDIGARH

                                              CWP No.24905 of 2012 (O&M)
                                              Date of Decision: 14.12.2012.

Jaspal Kaur & others                                       --Petitioners

                           Versus

State of Punjab & others                                   --Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA.

Present:-     Mr. Vikas Chatrath, Advocate for the petitioners.

              ***

TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA.J The present writ petition has been filed against the order dated 31.10.2008 (Annexure P-10) and order dated 21.04.2009 (Annexure P-11) whereby the benefit of three increments that had been granted to the petitioners w.e.f. the date of passing of the qualification of Giani/Parbhakar, had been withdrawn.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the issue stands settled by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in judgment dated 01.12.2009 passed in CWP No.738 of 2009 titled as Manjeet Kaur and others Vs. State of Punjab and others. Counsel further submits that the decision in Manjeet Kaur's case (Supra) has already been implemented and in this regard refers to the order dated 28.04.2011 (Annexure P-14) appended along with the present petition.

In the light of such factual background, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the present writ petition with directions to respondent/authorities to consider the claim of the petitioners as raised in the present petition in the light of the judgment dated 01.12.2009 passed in Manjeet Kaur and others Vs. State of Punjab and others. Needful be done within a period of three months from the receipt of certified copy of this order in terms of passing of a speaking order.

Petition disposed of.

(TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA) JUDGE 14.12.2012.

lucky