Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 41]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Sikandar Singh vs State Of Punjab on 17 May, 2022

Bench: Dinesh Maheshwari, Aniruddha Bose

                                                                       SLP (Crl.)   No.   2914/2022

     ITEM NO.36                           COURT NO.13                     SECTION II-B

                              S U P R E M E C O U R T O F         I N D I A
                                      RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)                 No.     2914/2022

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 09-02-2022
     in CRM-M No. 3243/2022 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana
     at Chandigarh)

     SIKANDAR SINGH & ANR.                                                Petitioner(s)

                                                 VERSUS

     STATE OF PUNJAB                                                      Respondent(s)

     (IA No. 45768/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED
     JUDGMENT and IA No. 45769/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)

     Date : 17-05-2022 These matters were called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE

     For Petitioner(s)             Mr.   Suvir Sidhu, Adv.
                                   Mr.   Apoorv Shukla, AOR
                                   Ms.   Ishita Farsaiya, Adv.
                                   Ms.   Prabhleen Kaur, Adv.
                                   Ms.   Sandhya Gaur, Adv.
                                   Mr.   Ayush Acharjee, Adv.

     For Respondent(s)             Ms. Jaspreet Gogia, AOR


                         UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                            O R D E R

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having perused the material on record, we are not persuaded to grant the concession of pre-arrest bail to the petitioners in this matter, at this stage. However, in the totality of circumstances, it does Signature Not Verified appear appropriate to provide for early consideration of their plea Digitally signed by Rajni Mukhi Date: 2022.05.18 19:14:28 IST Reason: for regular bail.

1 SLP (Crl.) No. 2914/2022

Therefore, while this petition seeking leave to appeal is dismissed, but it is provided that if the petitioners surrender within a week from today before the Trial Court and apply for regular bail, while giving at least 48 hours’ advance notice to the public prosecutor, their bail application may be considered expeditiously by the Trial Court.

All pending applications stand disposed of.

 (NEETA SAPRA)                                          (RANJANA SHAILEY)
COURT MASTER (SH)                                       COURT MASTER (NSH)




                                      2