Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 1]

Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur

Pradeep Mittal Son Of Shri Anand Shankar ... vs Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax on 11 March, 2022

Bench: Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, Sameer Jain

         HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                     BENCH AT JAIPUR

                  D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2490/2022

   Pradeep Mittal Son Of Shri Anand Shankar Mittal
                                                                     ----Petitioner
                                      Versus
   Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
                                                                   ----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Siddharth Ranka Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Anuroop Singhi Advocate. HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 11/03/2022 Heard.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in respect of other assesses where similar proceedings were initiated on the basis of certain cash transactions with Manihar Group, on identical situation, petitions have been entertained and interim orders have been passed. He would submit that in one of such case Shyam Sunder Khandelwal Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, DB Civil Writ Petition No.342/2022, considering similar petitions, notices have been issued and protection has been granted.

Issue notice to the respondent.

Mr. Anuroop Singhi, Advocate enter appearance and takes notice on behalf of the respondent.

A copy of this petition be supplied to Mr. Anuroop Singhi, Advocate.

(Downloaded on 16/03/2022 at 09:23:17 PM)

(2 of 2) [CW-2490/2022] Considering that prima facie, the issue raised in the petition is identical to that raised in petitions which are already pending before this Court, reference of which has been made in order dated 13.01.2022 passed in DB Civil Writ Petition No.342/2022 in respect of different assessment years, we deem it appropriate to pass similar interim order in the present case also to the effect that the respondent is restrained from proceeding further in the matter pursuant to proceedings initiated under Sections 147 and 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as against the petitioner in respect of order which is questioned in the present petition.

List this case along with DB Civil Writ Petition No.342/2022 and batch of petitions on 23.03.2022.

Learned counsel for the respondent may file reply. (SAMEER JAIN),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),ACTING CJ Sanjay Kumawat-1 (Downloaded on 16/03/2022 at 09:23:17 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)