Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Manjula W/O. Vasappa Kammar vs Karnataka Handloom Development ... on 23 February, 2012

Author: N.K.Patil

Bench: N.K.Patil

                                    1




       IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, CIRCUIT BENCH
                       AT DHARWAD.

          DATED THIS THE    23RD    DAY OF FEBRUARY 2012

                              BEFORE

               THE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE N.K.PATIL

               WRIT PETITION NO.60969/2012(S-TR)

BETWEEN:

Smt.Manjula, W/o Vasappa Kammar,
Age: 42 years,
0cc: Sales Assistant,
Gr.II in KHDC, R/o 22nd Cross,
Sulibhavi Colony,
Vidyagiri, Bagalkot.                                      ...   Petitioner

       (By Sri.S.S.Yadrami, Adv.)

AND:

1.     Karnataka Handloom Development
       Corporation,
       (Government of Karnataka under taking)
       Head Office at, 2nd Floor,
       Kiresur complex,
       Unkal Cross, Hubli-580031,
       By its Managing Director.

2.     The Project Administrator
       Intensive Handloom Development Project,
       Ilkal, Dist: Bagalkot.                    ...   Respondents

     This Writ Petition is filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of the
Constitution of India, praying to quash the impugned orders
passed by the respondent No.1 dated 10/01/2011 vide annexure
                                     2




 B and order passed by respon
                              dent No.2 dated 12/01/2012 at
 Annexure-C.

      This writ petition coming on for
                                       orders this day, the Court
 made the following:

                                ORDER

In the instant petition, petitioner is assailing the correctness of impugned orders passed by respondent No.1 bearing No. Ka.Kai.Aa.Ni/Aadalitha/Pra.Ka /4-20 11- 12/2109 dated 10.01.2011 vide Annexure-B and order passed by respondent No.2 bearing No. Ti.Kai.Aa.Yo/Ilka l/2011-12/533 dated 12.01.2012 vide Annexure-C.

2. Heard the learned counsel app earing for the petitioner.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 23.02.20 12 seeking for withdrawal of the petition.

4. In the light of the statement s made in the memo, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn at the risk of learne d counsel appearing for the petition er. Ordered accordingly.

Sd/ JUDGE hnm/