Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 10, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Dilip Pundalik Patil vs The State Of Maharashtra on 7 October, 2019

Author: V. K. Jadhav

Bench: V. K. Jadhav

                                                         47-BA-1117-2019.odt
                                      -1-
        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD

               47 BAIL APPLICATION NO.1117 OF 2019

                         DILIP PUNDALIK PATIL
                                 VERSUS
                     THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
                                    ...
             Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Brahme Shailesh P.
              APP for Respondent - State: Mr. S.D. Ghayal
                                    ...
                                  CORAM : V. K. JADHAV, J.
                                  DATED : 7th October, 2019

 PER COURT:-

 1.               The applicant is seeking Bail in connection with

 Crime No.23 of 2018 registered with Bhadgaon Police Station,

 District Jalgaon for the offences punishable under Sections 33,

 34, 36 and           38 of the Maharashtra Medical Practitioners Act,

 1961 and under Sections 419, 420, 468 and 471 of IPC. His

 application with similar prayer bearing Criminal Bail Application

 No.609 of 2019 came to be rejected by the Additional Sessions

 Judge, Jalgaon District Jalgaon vide order dated 23.08.2019.


 2.               Heard both the sides.


 3.               On going through the allegations made in the

 complaint and on perusal of the investigation papers, so also

 the supplementary charge-sheet, though certain Sections of

 the Maharashtra Medical Practitioners Act, 1961 and so also

 the Indian Penal Code such as Sections 419, 420, 468 and 471

 came to be added against the present applicant, however, as


::: Uploaded on - 09/10/2019                  ::: Downloaded on - 09/10/2019 23:26:27 :::
                                                             47-BA-1117-2019.odt
                                         -2-
 per the allegations, the applicant was practicing in Allopathy,

 though he is having the qualification to practice Electropathy,

 Naturopathy and Ayurved. Learned counsel for the applicant,

 on instructions, submits that the applicant is ready to submit

 the undertaking to the effect that he would not practice even

 the Electropathy, Naturopathy and Ayurved till disposal of the

 case. The applicant is in jail since 25.02.2019. The charge-

 sheet came to be submitted on 22.04.2019 and supplementary

 charge-sheet came to be submitted on 15.07.2019. The

 applicant has a fixed place of residence. He is easily available

 for trial. So far as the question of practicing Allopathy after

 release on bail, the applicant is now ready to file an

 undertaking after his release on bail to the effect that he would

 not practice in the Electropathy, Naturopathy and Ayurved

 while on bail till disposal of the case. In view of the same, I am

 inclined to release the applicant on bail with certain conditions.

 Hence, the following order:

                                    ORDER

I. The application is hereby allowed.

II. The applicant viz. DILIP PUNDALIK PATIL, in connection with Crime No.23 of 2018 registered with Bhadgaon Police Station, District Jalgaon for the offences punishable under Sections 33, 34, 36 and 38 of the Maharashtra Medical Practitioners Act, 1961 and under Sections 419, 420, 468 and 471 of IPC, be released on bail on ::: Uploaded on - 09/10/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 09/10/2019 23:26:27 ::: 47-BA-1117-2019.odt -3- furnishing P.B. of Rs.50,000/-, with one solvent surety of the like amount, on the following conditions;

(a) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence in any manner.

(b) The applicant shall not practice in Electropathy, Naturopathy and Ayurved as assured by him till disposal of the case and file an undertaking to that effect before the trial Court.

III. The application is accordingly disposed of.

(V. K. JADHAV, J.) Sam..

::: Uploaded on - 09/10/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 09/10/2019 23:26:27 :::