Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

State Of West Bengal vs Emami Biotech Ltd. . on 8 May, 2014

ITEM NO.603(MM)                        COURT NO.13               SECTION III


               S U P R E M E         C O U R T   O F    I N D I A
                                  RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).12643/2014

(From the judgement and order dated 13/03/2014 in WP No.980/2011,APO
No.430/2013 of The HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA)

STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.                                  Petitioner(s)

                      VERSUS

EMAMI BIOTECH LTD. & ORS.                                    Respondent(s)

(With prayer for interim relief )

Date: 08/05/2014       This Petition was called on for mentioning today.

CORAM :
            HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA
            HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE


For Petitioner(s)
                          Mr. Anip Sachthey,Adv.

For Respondent(s)         Mr.     Parag P.Tripathi,Sr.Adv.
R.1/Caveator              Mr.     Abhimanyu Bhandari,Adv.
                          Mr.     S.D.Dwivedi,Adv.
                          Mr.     Saket Sikri,Adv.
                          Mr.     Manisha Handa,Adv.
                          Mr.     Naveen Kumar,Adv.

                          Mrs Sarla Chandra,Adv.(NP)

      UPON being mentioned by counsel the Court made the following
                               O R D E R

Heard Mr. Anip Sachthey, learned counsel for the State of West Bengal and Mr. Parag P. Tripathi, learned senior counsel for the respondent.

-2-

The factual controversy as emerged in this petition need not be stated in detail, for Mr. Anip Sachthey, learned counsel appearing for the State, fairly stated that the State is duty bound in law to comply with the order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court. Be it mentioned that the High Court had granted forty two months for payment of the amount in seven instalments. We are inclined to extend the period from forty two months to five years and therefore we think that there should be ten instalments and accordingly it is so directed. It is necessary to state here that the aforesaid amount shall be paid by the State of West Bengal to Industrial Development Corporation which in turn shall pay it to the Department of Commercial Taxes, State of West Bengal, in the account of the assessee.

Mr. Parag P. Tripathi, learned senior counsel submitted that he has no objection for this arrangement but the Sales Tax Authorities should not take any coercive steps pertaining to payment of this subsidy against the assessee as it is the responsibility of the State. This position is acceded to by Mr. Anip Sachthey. Hence, it is directed that till the amount of subsidy -2- has undertaken by the State of West Bengal is paid to the Department of Commercial Taxes, State of West Bengal, no coercive steps shall be taken against the assessee.

We have been apprised at the Bar that as the State of West Bengal was not respecting its commitment a proceeding for contempt in CC No. 121/2013 had been initiated by the assessee, for it was compelled to pay the amount to the Sales Tax Department. In view of the order, no coercive step shall be taken, the proceedings for contempt which were initiated before the High Court of Calcutta, shall stand dropped.

With the aforesaid modifications in the order of the High Court and directions this special leave petition is disposed of.

(SUMAN WADHWA)                    (SNEH LATA SHARMA)
 AR-cum- PS                         COURT MASTER