Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Life Insurance Corporation Of India vs Smt. Ushabai Sanjay Shelke on 7 May, 2013

  
 
 
 
 
 
 BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL 
  
 
 
 







 



 
   
   
   


   
     
     
     

BEFORE THE
    HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL 
    
   
    
     
     

COMMISSION,  MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI
    
   
  
  
   

 
  
 
  
   
   

 
  
 
  
   
   
     
     
     
       
       
       

First Appeal
      No. A/11/510
      
     
      
       
       

(Arisen out
      of Order Dated 28/04/2011 in Case No. 678/2010 of District Solapur)
      
     
    
     

 
    
   
    
     
     

 
    
   
    
     
     
       
       
       
         
         
         

1.

LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA PUNE D. O. 4 TH FLOOR, MAHAVIR PARK, S. N. 688, A B 2, PUNE SAARA ROAD, BIBEWEWADI, PUNE 411037.

THROUGH DIV. MANAGER WESTERN ZONAL OFFICE YOGEKSHEMA, JEEVAN BIMA MARG, MUMBAI 400021.

...........Appellant(s)     Versus    

1. SMT. USHABAI SANJAY SHELKE R/AT POST BONDALE (SHINDE VASTI) TAL MALSHIRAS , DIST.SOLAPUR.

...........Respondent(s)   BEFORE:

   
HON'BLE MR. Dhanraj Khamatkar PRESIDING MEMBER   HON'BLE MR. Narendra Kawde MEMBER   PRESENT:
A S VIDYARTHI , Advocate for the Appellant     DATED : 07/05/2013 ORDER (Per Shri Dhanraj Khamatkar, Honble Presiding Member )   (1) The order dated 03/10/2012 is self-operative order. It is stated that the appellant is directed to supply appeal compilation and deposit required postage in the office of the Commission within 7 days, failing which the appeal shall stand dismissed automatically without further reference to the Commission and matter was adjourned to 17/12/2012.

As per the self-operative order, the appellant failed to comply with the order dated 03/10/2012. Being self-operative order, we cannot modify the same in view of rulings of the Apex Court. Appeal stands disposed off accordingly. 

 

(2) The counsel for the appellant prayed that the amount deposited shall not be disbursed till the revision period is over. Accordingly, prayer of the appellant is granted.

   

[HON'BLE MR.

Dhanraj Khamatkar] PRESIDING MEMBER         [HON'BLE MR.

Narendra Kawde] MEMBER   pgg