Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Divya S.S Rose vs State Of Kerala on 29 June, 2022

Author: K. Babu

Bench: K. Babu

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                      PRESENT
                         THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. BABU
               Wednesday, the 29th day of June 2022 / 8th Ashadha, 1944
                               CRL.MC NO. 2384 OF 2022

CRIME NO.1/2021 OF VACB, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, Thiruvananthapuram

  PETITIONER:

       DIVYA S.S ROSE AGED 38 YEARS WIFE OF ARAVIND S.G, RESIDING AT
       ARAVINDAM, KADAVINMOOLA, VENGANOOR P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DT.-695
       523. NOW WORKING AS RANGE FOREST OFFICER, FOREST TRAINING INSTITUTE,
       WALAYAR P.O, PALAKKAD DT. - 678 624, PIN - 678624

  RESPONDENTS:

     1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF
        KERALA, PIN - 682031
     2. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE VIGILANCE AND ANTI CORRUPTION
        BEURO (VACB), SOUTHERN RANGE, VIKAS BHAVAN, PALAYALAM,
        THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DT.- 695 033, PIN - 695033
     3. BIJU C.P AGED 50 YEARS SON OF CHELLAPPAN PILLAI, 'HARITHA',
        VELLOORKONAM P.O, NEDUMANGAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DT. - 695 541, PIN
        - 695541


       This     Crl.MC coming on for orders upon perusing the application and

  upon hearing arguments of MR. CIBI THOMAS,Advocate for the petitioner, and

  of PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the 1st & 2nd respondents, the court      passed the

  following:

                                                                          P.T.O.
                        K. BABU, J.
          ========================
              Crl. M.C. No. 2384 of 2022
          ========================
           Dated this the 29th day of June, 2022

                           ORDER

The notice sent to respondent No. 3 has been returned with the endorsement 'not known'.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption Bureau (VACB), Southern Range, Thiruvanathapuram is directed to serve notice to respondent No. 3.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, delay in investigation stands in the way of the promotion due to the petitioner in the department. The Investigating Officer submitted a report stating that, investigation could be completed within three months, after obtaining the voice analysis report from the Forensic Laboratory, Thiruvanathapuram. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the Investigating Officer has already collected the voice samples of the petitioner.

Crl. M.C. No. 2384 of 2022

2

4. Therefore, the Director of Forensic Laboratory shall complete the process of analysis of the voice sample and submit report within a period of one month from the date of receipt of the voice sample.

Post on 21.07.2022.

Sd/-

K. BABU, JUDGE LU H/o 29-06-2022 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar