Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Kerala High Court

Federal Bank Officers Association vs The Federal Bank Ltd on 18 September, 2023

Author: Devan Ramachandran

Bench: Devan Ramachandran

            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                              PRESENT
       THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
  MONDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023 / 27TH BHADRA,
                                   1945
                       OP(C) NO. 943 OF 2023
  AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT CMA 25/2021 OF ADDITIONAL
 DISTRICT COURT & MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL , NORTH
                              PARAVUR
PETITIONER/APPELLANT IN CMA NO.25/2021:

            FEDERAL BANK OFFICERS ASSOCIATION
            FBOA CENTRE, FBOA ROAD, ALUVA-683 101.
            REP. BY GENERAL SECRETARY, SRI. SHIMITH P R,
            AGED 49, S/O RAMAKRISHNAN PK, SENIOR MANAGER,
            OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT, FEDERAL BANK LTD.,
            ALUVA, ERNAKULAM-683 101.
            BY ADVS.
            N.ABHILASH
            R.ARUN (PALLURUTHY)
            P.S.SUJETH
            ALBIN VARGHESE
            ABISHA.E.R


RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT IN CMA NO.25/2021:

            THE FEDERAL BANK LTD
            REPRESENTED BY SUDHEESH KUMAR M DEPUTY VICE
            PRESIDENT (HR) HR DEPARTMENT, THE FEDERAL BANK
            LTD HEAD OFFICE, FEDERAL TOWERS BANK JUNCTION,
            ALUVA, ERNAKULAM-683101.
            BY ADV LATHA ANAND
THIS   OP    (CIVIL)    HAVING      COME    UP    FOR   ADMISSION    ON
18.09.2023,     THE   COURT   ON    THE    SAME   DAY   DELIVERED   THE
FOLLOWING:
 OP(C)943/23
                                ..2..



                          JUDGMENT

When this matter was called today, learned counsel for both sides were ad idem that the learned District Court, North Paravur, is now hearing CMA No.25/2021.

In the afore circumstances, this Original Petition is closed, however with liberty to the petitioner to approach this Court again; if it becomes so warranted in future.

Sd/-

DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, JUDGE ACR OP(C)943/23 ..3..

APPENDIX OF OP(C) 943/2023 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE E-COURT STATUS OF CMA NO. 25/2021 DATED 08/10/2021 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, NORTH PARAVUR.

Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE E-COURT STATUS OF CMA NO. 25/2021 DATED 01.02.2023 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, NORTH PARAVUR Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN IA NO.01/2020 IN OS NO.204/2020 OF HON'BLE MUNSIFF COURT, ALUVA DATED 07.01.2021 Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF CMA NO. 25/2021 DATED 20.07.2021 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, NORTH PARAVUR Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE E-COURT STATUS OF CMA NO. 25/2021 DATED 14.12.2021 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, NORTH PARAVUR Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE E-COURT STATUS OF CMA NO. 25/2021 DATED 23.03.2022 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, NORTH PARAVUR