Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Idhayathulla vs The Commissioner Of Police on 12 October, 2018

Author: N.Anand Venkatesh

Bench: N.Anand Venkatesh

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.10.2018 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH Crl.O.P.(MD).No.18087 of 2018

1.Idhayathulla

2.Kaleel Ahamed ...Petitioners Vs.

1.The Commissioner of Police, Tirunelveli District.

2.The Assistant Commissioner of Police (L & O), Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli.

3.The Inspector of Police, Melappalayam Police Station, Tirunelveli City.

4.M.Karuppasamy

5.M.Raja

6.Poolpandi ...Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to direct the respondents No.2 and 3 not to harass the petitioners by interfereing into their right in connection with the property situated in Survey No.509/1b, T.S.NO.202, Ward AB, Block 7, Measuring to the extent of 52 cents, Kulavanigapuram Village, Palayamkottai Taluk, Tirunelveli District.

!For Petitioners                :Mr.R.Anand
^For R1 to  R3          :Mr.M.Chandra Sekaran  
                                         Additional Public Prosecutor
        
:Order

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondent police not to harass the petitioners.

2. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents police would submit that on a complaint given against the petitioner, petition enquiry is pending in CSR No.583 of 2018, on the file of the second respondent police.

4. The petitioners are directed to cooperate with the police for enquiry and at the time of conducting of the enquiry, the petitioners shall not be harassed by the police. The police cannot call the petitioner on a regular basis in the guise of enquiry without even registering an FIR and the Supreme Court of India in Lalitha Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh reported in 2013 (6) CTC 353 has enumerated the nature of cases where preliminary enquiry can be conducted and has also restricted the period, for which the preliminary enquiry can be conducted. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the respondent Police is free to register an FIR and this order shall not be a shield for the petitioners against the respondents proceedings to take action in accordance with law.

5. With the above directions, the Criminal Original Petition is closed.

To

1.The Commissioner of Police, Tirunelveli District.

2.The Assistant Commissioner of Police (L & O), Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli.

3.The Inspector of Police, Melappalayam Police Station, Tirunelveli City.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

.