Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

Sukanta Mazumder vs The New India Assurance Company Limited ... on 13 May, 2025

                                                                    Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010166242020




                                                             undefined

                       THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                         Case No. : MACApp./283/2020

         SUKANTA MAZUMDER
         S/O- SUDHIR CHANDRA MAZUMDER, VILL.- ALOICHERRA PT.-1, P.O.
         MANIPUR BAGAN, P.S. KATLICHERRA, DIST.- HAILAKANDI, ASSAM, PIN-
         788165 AND CURRENTLY RESIDING AT SUBIR BHOWMIK BILPAR, MANDIR
         DIGHIPAR, P.O. AND P.S. SILCHAR, DIST.- CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN- 788001.



         VERSUS

         THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED AND 2 ORS.
         REP. BY THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE
         COMPANY LTD., CAPITAL TRAVELS BUILDING, CLUB ROAD, P.O. AND P.S.
         SILCHAR, DIST.- CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN- 788001. (INSURER OF THE
         OFFENDING VEHICLE NO. AS-11-AC-0444, TATA SPACIO).

         2:SMTI. JYOTI RANI NATH
         W/O- JAGADISH CH. NATH
          C/O- MOTIUR RAHMAN BARBHUIYA
         VILL. AND P.O. KAZIDHAR PART-II
          NARSHINGPUR
          DIST.- CACHAR
         ASSAM
          PIN- 788115. (OWNER OF THE OFFENDING VEHICLE NO. AS-11-AC-0444
         TATA SPACIO).

         3:SRI PURNIMA SINGH
          S/O- CHOTA SINGH
         VILL. AND P.O. KAJIDHOR
          DIST.- CACHAR
         ASSAM
          PIN- 788115. (DRIVER OF THE OFFENDING VEHICLE NO. AS-11-AC-0444
         TATA SPACIO)
                                                                            Page No.# 2/2

Advocate for the Petitioner     : MR. S B LASKAR, MS D DUTTA,MS N KALITA,MR. H A
LASKAR

Advocate for the Respondent : MR. A DUTTA (R-1), MS S MOCHAHARI(R-1),MR. S DUTTA (R-
1),MR SISHIR DUTTA(R-1),MRS. P M DUTTA (R-1)


                                          BEFORE
                              Hon'ble MRS. JUSTICE MARLI VANKUNG

                                          ORDER

13.05.2025 Heard Mr. S.B. Laskar, learned counsel for the appellant, who submits that the appellant is entitled to get his increment for a period of 1 year if he had been able to complete his Ph.D had it not been for the accident, which occurred on 28.11.2012. He submits that he may be allowed to produce the document showing the increment which he would have got, had he been able to complete his Ph.D degree.

Prayer is allowed.

The learned counsel for the appellant is allowed to produce the documents to show his claim that he would have got a certain amount of increment during the period of 1 year after the accident, had he got his Ph.D degree from the appropriate authority.

Mr. S. Dutta, learned counsel for respondent No. 1 is present.

List the matter after 3 (three) weeks.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant