Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Gaurav Subhash Desai vs The State Of Maharashtra on 16 October, 2023

Author: N. J. Jamadar

Bench: N. J. Jamadar

2023:BHC-AS:31069

                                                             59-ABA-2508-23.DOC


                                                                     Sayali Upasani



                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                           CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                    ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2508 OF 2023



             Gaurav Subhash Desai                                  ...Applicant

                                   Vs.
             The State of Maharashtra                            ...Respondent


             Mr. Pramod Kumbhar, for Applicant.
             Mr. A. A. Takalkar, APP for State.


                                                 CORAM:- N. J. JAMADAR, J.
                                                 DATED:- 16th OCTOBER, 2023
             PC:-

             1)     Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

             2)     This is an application for pre-arrest bail in connection with

             CR No. 8 of 2021, registered with MIDC Police Station, Mumbai,

             for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468

             and 471 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 ("the Penal Code").

             3)     When the application was listed before the Court on 5 th

             September, 2023, this Court was persuaded to grant interim bail

             observing, inter alia, as under:-

                                             1/3
                                                         59-ABA-2508-23.DOC


                 "3. The indictment against the applicant is that the
                applicant and the co-accused induced the applicant
                to part with a sum of Rs.17,00,000/-by making a false
                representation that the first informant would be
                deprived of a room in a rehabilitation scheme. The
                applicant and the co-accused allegedly delivered false
                and forged documents to induce the applicant to part
                with money.
                4. I have perused the allegations in the FIR. It prima
                facie appears that the allegations are primarily
                against one Nitin Pawar, to whom the first informant
                claims to have paid the amount. The applicant was
                allegedly present when the first informant paid money
                to the said Nitin Pawar. The applicant was also stated
                to be a witness to be MOU executed between the first
                informant and Nitin. However, the role of deceiving
                the first informant and preparing or using the forged
                documents does not seem to be have been, prima
                facie, attributed to the applicant."


4)        The learned Counsel for the applicant submits that

pursuant to the aforesaid order, the applicant has appeared

before the Investigating Officer.

5)        Having regard to the nature of the accusation and the

reasons which weighed with this Court while granting interim

bail, I am inclined to make the order of interim bail absolute.

6)        Hence, the following order.

                                   ORDER

I) The order of interim bail dated 5 th September, 2023 is made absolute on the terms and conditions incorporated therein.

II) The applicant shall henceforth appear before the Investigating Officer as and when directed. 2/3

59-ABA-2508-23.DOC III) The applicant shall regularly attend the proceedings before the jurisdictional Court. IV) The application stands disposed.

[N. J. JAMADAR, J.] 3/3 Signed by: Sayali D Upasani Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 18/10/2023 11:08:45