Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Kerala High Court

Marshal Varghese vs State Of Kerla on 3 September, 2014

Author: K. Vinod Chandran

Bench: K.Vinod Chandran

       

  

  

 
 
                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                         PRESENT:

                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN

       WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2014/12TH BHADRA, 1936

                               WP(C).No. 23619 of 2014 (B)
                                   ----------------------------

PETITIONER(S):
----------------------

         MARSHAL VARGHESE
         S/O VARGHESE, AREECKAL HOUSE, NAYATHODE P.O
         ANGAMALY,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT


           BY ADV. SRI.JIJO JOSEPH

RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------

         1.        STATE OF KERLA
                   REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
                   DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, TRIVANDRUM

         2.        THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS),
                   DEPARTMENT COMMERCIAL TAXES, ERNAKULAM

         3.        THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, ANGAMALY

         4.        THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, REVENUE RECOVERY,ALUVA


           R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN

           THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
           ON 03-09-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
           FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 23619 of 2014 (B)
---------------------------------------
                                            APPENDIX

PETITIONERS EXHIBTS:

EXT.P1             COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2011-12
                   DTD.23.01.14 ALONG WITH THE DEMAND OF TAX BY THE 3RD
                   RESPONDENT.U/S 25(1)

EXT.P2             COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2012-13
                   DTD,10.2.14 ALONG WITH THE NOTICE OF DEMAND BY THE 3RD
                   RESPONDENT U/S 25(1)

EXT.P3             COPY OF THE STATUTORY APPEAL NO.963-14 DTD.26.3.14 FILED
                   BY THE PETITIONER IN PURSUANT TO EXT.P1 ORDER BEFORE
                   2ND RESPONDENT.

EXT.P4             COPY OF THE STATUTORY APPEAL NO.964/14 DTD. 26.3.14 FILED
                   BY THE PETITIONER IN PURSUANT TO EXT.P2 ORDER BEFORE
                   THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXT.P5             COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DTD.26.3.14 FILED ALONG WITH THE
                   EXT.P3APPEAL BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXT.P6             COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DTD.23.6.14 FILED ALONG WITH THE
                   EXT.P4APPEAL BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXT.P7             COPY OF THE DELAY CONDONATION PETITION FILED ALONG WITH
                   THE EXT.P3 STATUTORY APPEALS

EXT.P8             COPY OF THE DELAY CONDONATION PETITION FILED ALONG WITH
                   THE EXT.P4 STATUTORY APPEALS

EXT.P9             COPY OF THE URGENT HEARING PETITION FILED ALONG WITH
                   THE EXT.P3 STATUTORY APPEAL.

EXT.P10            COPY OF THE URGENT HEARING PETITION FILED ALONG WITH
                   THE EXTP.P4 STATUTORY APPEAL.

EXT.P11            COPY OF THE REVENUE RECOVERY NOTICE ISSUED BY 4TH
                   RESPONDENT DTD.6.8.14 IN PURSUANT TO EXT.P1

EXT.P12            COPY OF THE REVENUE RECOVERY NOTICE ISSUED BY 4TH
                   RESPONDENT DTD.6.8.14 IN PURSUANT TO EXT.P2

RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:                    NIL

                                         // TRUE COPY //

                                         P.A TO JUDGE.
SB



                K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
             =====================
              W.P.(C) No. 23619 of 2014 - B
             ======================
       Dated this the 3rd day of September, 2014

                     J U D G M E N T

Exts.P1 and P2 are the assessment orders passed against the petitioner for the years 2011-12 and 2012-13 respectively. Against these orders, petitioner filed Exts.P3 and P4 appeals, which are accompanied by Exts.P5 and P6 stay petitions and also Exts.P7 and P8 applications to condone delay in filing appeals, before the 2nd respondent. Appeals and stay petitions are pending before the 2nd respondent. In the meanwhile, coercive proceedings have been initiated. It is in this context, the writ petition has been filed.

2. In the above circumstances, it is directed that the appellate authority, the 2nd respondent herein, shall consider Exts.P7 and P8 delay petitions and pass orders after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner at any rate within a period of one month from today. If delay W.P.(C) No. 23619 of 2014 - B 2 is condoned, then the 2nd respondent shall dispose of Exts.P5 and P6 stay petitions, simultaneously and the coercive proceedings be stayed until such orders are passed, which order shall determine the matter thereafter.

Writ petition disposed of.

Sd/-

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB // True Copy // P.A To Judge.